Gilly wrote:
For anybody who believes this is conspiracy theory talk, you have to understand that nobody in the federal government is going to openly propose that they are building facilities to detain large numbers of Americans during a martial law scenario. If they did they’d be widely criticized and the legislation would go nowhere. Instead they are going to make it sound as if these facilities are to be used for a beneficial purpose in order to conceal what they could ultimately be used for which is why they are called national emergency centers instead of FEMA camps or concentration camp facilities.
They always write things so as to leave themselves enough ambiguous lee-way to have an "in" or
backdoor for their real plans. This much we now know from experience.
*cough* Patriot Act *cough* [Although that magnum opus was far more explicit in its wording, you still get my drift]
Gilly wrote:
In addition to what we just covered with KBR and the refurbishment of the old Japanese internment camps, there have been many people who have identified strange government facilities around the United States that appeared to be setup for the purpose of holding large numbers of people. As a result, this bill if passed into law would simply expand upon pre-existing facilities and create a more robust FEMA camp infrastructure. Keep in mind that the bill
authorizes a minimum of 6 national emergency centers but that’s just the minimum. Potentially this bill could authorize the establishment of many national emergency centers or FEMA camps and that is not acceptable.
www.blacklistednews.com/The_Fema_Camp_Bi...133/0/38/38/Y/M.html
I'm not one to play prophet, but just for giggles & haha's let's see where these wonderful places may best be set up for maximum effectiveness.
I'd say....
New York [upstate],
Georgia [with the CDC in Atlanta, how convenient?],
Texas,
Nebraska,
California [northern] and
Idaho. With any
real problematic detainees being shipped off to a possible spill-over facility in Alaska. Sounds a little
sci-fi movie of the week but then again, doesn't everything lately?? I'm not placing any bets, just throwing some thoughts around.
Not to leave out
Colorado. I'm sure they'd factor into this somehow. In fact I'd probably say Colorado instead of Idaho but was just thinking location-wise and how it would fan-out best to cover each region. Kinda leaning more towards Colorado now, but it's only speculation at this point. Hopefully none of this will
ever play out!!