online.wsj.com/article/SB95326824311657269.html
Why We Spy on Our Allies .
Former CIA director R. James Woolsey explains why America spies on its allies
Yes, my continental European friends, we have spied on you.
The European Parliament's recent report on Echelon, written by British journalist Duncan Campbell, has sparked angry accusations from continental Europe that U.S. intelligence is stealing advanced technology from European companies so that we can -- get this -- give it to American companies and help them compete. My European friends, get real. True, in a handful of areas European technology surpasses American, but, to say this as gently as I can, the number of such areas is very, very, very small. Most European technology just isn't worth our stealing.
That's right, my continental friends, we have spied on you because you bribe. Your companies' products are often more costly, less technically advanced or both, than your American competitors'. As a result you bribe a lot.
This upsets you, and sometimes creates recriminations between your bribers and the other country's bribees, and this occasionally becomes a public scandal. We love it.
It is because your economic patron saint is still Jean Baptiste Colbert, whereas ours is Adam Smith. In spite of a few recent reforms, your governments largely still dominate your economies, so you have much greater difficulty than we in innovating
Get serious, Europeans. Stop blaming us and reform your own statist economic policies. Then your companies can become more efficient and innovative, and they won't need to resort to bribery to compete.
And then we won't need to spy on you.
Indeed we are to blame for the illegal spying and for not being considered "allies" in any normal sense of the word.
This is because we have failed to live up to the American economic model. We did not conform to the only true model of society.
And so, whatever injustice that has taken place, we brought it upon ourselves.
Next week: why Americans are genetically, sociologically and spiritually superior to their European allies subordinates.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.