Chris Anderson, head honcho at TED, has responded to Nick Hanauer’s claims that his TED talk was censored. TED, Anderson says, tries “to steer clear of talks that are bound to descend into the same dismal partisan head-butting people” and that Hanauer “framed the issue in a way that was explicitly partisan.” The upshot, though, is that he’s letting viewers decide for themselves. Watch the video below.




Link:

"If it was true that lower taxes for the rich and more wealth for the wealthy lead to job creation, today we would be drowning in jobs"

These days and others in the past are cyclical and the current cycle is nearing its closing stages, the circus is full and the clowns are handing out Ted, Icke and Wilcox and all the other motley crews as bread.

There is really only one way forward in these neglecting paradigm models of last chance roulette and on our own model, and that is become your own individual governments which in itself is the sollution, not from any book, video or austerity measure but your own re-skilled hands.

We are on our own as we are today behind six foot fences being guided, thus making us all without voice.

Nature and busy hands is the only religion I need to live alone in a bee loud glade.

If govt printed its own money then taxation would only be necessary for prevention of inflation.

Its a very simple forgotten principle, forgotten because politicians don't want the responsibility. If people only knew the truth huh?

andyh wrote:
It is one way to stem the theft from those who use tokens to steal from the enviornment, I say steal because all models of payment for the labour is a kind of theft.
As we are the government does print its own money, the ones who own the worlds bank and banks are the current global government by a greater degree, thus the world order is already here.

If one goes back in time to when the Aboriginals were found in Tasmania who were using stone tools that were inferior to the ones used in Europe 4000 years earlier.

Here is a stasis is a way of getting by indefinately and until we see things for what we are we go forward one step and two backwards money creates this scenario interest or no.

I have an old neighbour here who say we cannot go backwards and we are in many ways if we ignore the visible and continual destruction taking place because we lost our edge and forgot how to live on our own intuition.

Greatness is always temporary.

Its ironic to think that people view 'going backwards' as impossible when the current going 'forwards' is in fact simply standing still.
There has never been much proper change for the better imho.

Its a process of de-volution imho, we're in actual fact going backwards not forwards.
Progress would be a govt looking to reduce its role and increase the role of its citizens.
Since when have we ever done that?

andyh wrote:
Not intending to come across as condescending, but I am doing it as we speak and yourself to a degree, if you know what I mean.

We both know its the only way.

The Apprentice wrote:
Thats 'us' though, not the rest of the circus

andyh wrote:
By the time billy smarts has left town it could be too late for most and the ones left will probably follow the wrong piper for handouts to keep them just about broke.

We have seen it so many times in the past that the minds eye is being willfully blind just in case.

What else do unsane people do in an unsane paradigm.