Firstly, let me make it clear that I have never visited Internet forums. They can be a great source of slagging off and spreading disinformation and exchange by some very unintelligent and self obscessed people. But through this medium has emerged a a drunkin mentality, what I call Boozed up Forum Man, that we need to be aware of and, more than anything,pissed up Forum Man needs to be aware of.me a complete charlatan

I say ‘Man’ because from what I have seen this Diftard mentality is expressed mostly through the I am's mind, though certainly not exclusively...Pissed up Forum Man sits at his computer hiding behind Sock puppet names, often hurling abuse at me the Godhead directions, and claims to be asking questions about my charlatan way oflife and world events while I'm talking the most monumental bollocks ...

... Daisy’, bless him, also wheels out the headshaking mentality that I have experienced virtually the entire time I have been on this Drunkard road. He says that I get programmes about me on the BBC (I don’t, but fingers crossed) ‘while other researchers get taken out’. I love this one. This is a step on even from the ‘if you are well known you must be a front man for "them"'. Here we have reached the Diftardia Zone in which to be really credible i must be must be brain dead.

These Diftards, and they are extremely large in number, are not able to conceive of other forces at work intent on bringing down the walls of supidity and control because they are stuck firm in the conspiracy version of the victim mentality drunkness. Theirs is the world of the me the hero who fought so bravely against all the odds with God, truth and justice on his side, but then was tragically taken out by the forces of evil, or the ‘Feds’, which is basically the same thing.

‘Godheads a drunkin buffoon , folks, what more proof do you need that he was right?’

‘You still alive? You must be one of “them”.’

It reminds me of the old drinking stool where they used to hold alleged my head under the water after I said i could walk on water they were accepted not to have been a Godhead, but if they didn’t die they were convicted. I think they called it a night at the Pub

A mod posting a pic like this and dicussing the man's arthritis on a public forum open to visitors: that is just FUBAR.

If I had my tinfoil hat on I would almost think that some people are WANTING the forum to look bad.

You have serious issues with labels!

As for the subject and topic - DI discusses various people being blood sucking lizards and points the finger directly at individuals as well as their blood lines. Which makes it relevant and very much on topic and worthy of debate. He is the one raising the issue of bloodlines publicly and as a public figure he is open to investigation!.

Disregarding the hat comment in you closing line there could well be a case for that view.

Frog wrote:
I wasn't aware I had attributed a label.

Frog wrote:
I didn't express concern over the discussion of his geneology. It was the speculation as to the cause of his disability and chronic pain coupled with photo-shopped pictures with him in a Viking helmet that I thought was going too far. Either one of these things could have been tolerable, I suppose, but together....I have to say that it left a very bad taste.

That is just my opinion but after all, what else can I offer?

Frog wrote:
I am not quite sure what you mean, so I'll let you clarify further.

I like a laugh too folks but as WUB quite rightly pointed out, making fun out of somebody's disabiity is fucking appalling.

And these pics belong on Sodlike Productions. Not SZ in my opinion.

All they do is make us look like an Icke -bashing forum confirming the misinfo spread by Sean-I_am and co.

If you want to criticise Icke, by all means. But these photos persuade nobody and only makes us look like haters: keep it to tthe rant section please.

A mod posting a pic like this and dicussing the man's arthritis on a public forum open to visitors: that is just FUBAR.

If I had my tinfoil hat on I would almost think that some people are WANTING the forum to look bad.

I like a laugh too folks but as WUB quite rightly pointed out, making fun out of somebody's disabiity is fucking appalling.

And these pics belong on Sodlike Productions. Not SZ in my opinion.

All they do is make us look like an Icke -bashing forum confirming the misinfo spread by Sean-I_am and co.

If you want to criticise Icke, by all means. But these photos persuade nobody and only makes us look like haters: keep it to tthe rant section please.

A mod posting a pic like this and dicussing the man's arthritis on a public forum open to visitors: that is just FUBAR.

If I had my tinfoil hat on I would almost think that some people are WANTING the forum to look bad.

Would you please clarify this for me and let me know what part of my post (if it is mine you are referring to) that is "making fun out of somebody's diabilty" ?[/b][/color]

I AM ALL I AM wrote:
#40, #47, #53

If you took it to mean that I was laughing at DI's disability there's not much I can do about that.

.Otherwise, the question about it being Dupuytren's Contracture was a legitimate inquiry that I had made elsewhere quite a while ago now, and pointed out to Black Cloud in my response to him.

I hope Black Cloud comes back.