I'm ready to trash everything I believe tomorrow if someone can show me that it's incorrect

Do you think violence is the only way to change the government?

I think your Taoism was a viable philosophy for everyday life 2000 or so years ago in Feudal China but I think to invoke Taoism as a method of living under/co-existing with the modern Capitalist state is slightly ill advised, to maintain the balance of Yin and Yang in modern Capitalist society would require the masses adopt an almost slave or pavement like passivity (yin) to counteract the assertive dominance (yang) of the Capitalist elite.

Have you seen the Corporation?
What did you think of that?

Yes,yes, keep going find older dictionaries and older books which reference it.

Sigh....again keep going and find older dictionaries and look for the earliest use of the word.

Also note how you used the word 'person' there?

andyh wrote:
Find an older dictionary, find a newer dictionary or find YOUR dictionary? The point I am making is that the word has different interpretations. You refuse to accept mine fine but I explained my interpretation so your nitpicking of my posts is not necessary. I really don`t proof read what I type but thanks for doing it for me.

Back to the original topic I noticed that David Icke is all friendly with Alex Jones now and I wonder if that is because they have the same agenda or are they just trying to use each other. Or is it something else.

We are the most pronounced enemies of every sort of official power– even if it is an ultra-revolutionary power. We are the enemies of any sort of publicly declared dictatorship, we are social revolutionary anarchists. But, you will ask, if we are anarchists, by what right do we want to influence the people, and what methods will we use? Denouncing all power, with what sort of power, or rather by what sort of force, shall we direct a people's revolution? By a force that is invisible, that no one admits and that is not imposed on anyone, by the collective dictatorship of our organization which will be all the greater the more it remains unseen and undeclared, the more it is deprived of all official rights and significance...[Secret organizations] would finally have the strength of that close solidarity which binds isolated groups in one organic whole...These groups would not seek anything for themselves...and they would be in a position to direct popular movements...This is what I call the collective dictatorship of a secret organization.