andyh wrote:
psketti wrote:
feather wrote:
It's much broader than schools now.
working regularly with children
working in certain activities with adults considered vulnerable at that particular time
working in healthcare
have applied to be a foster carer, adoptive parent or childminder.
It should always have been that way.
The price paid to make it so, was tragic.
Who does the reviews?
Considering they don't want cops in NY with an IQ over 105 I wouldn't trust govt to make the right decision about who gets to look out for kids either...
The CRB check just consists of a slip of paper which indicates any criminal record you may have - I think it comes to you, rather than the party that's ordered it, and you're required to hand it over to them. It includes offences which are deemed to have been 'spent'.
I agree 100% that anyone working with kids or vulnerable people should have the check done.
Lots of would-be employers these days insist on a CRB check being done - not just schools.
The problem lies (and there always does seem to be a problem with matters that should be straight-forward) with the potential employer sometimes failing to use common sense.
I was listening to a programme on the radio a few years ago, where people where ringing in to relate their experiences with it.
One example, was a man who'd been refused a job he'd applied for, because his CRB checked revealed that 30 years previously, he'd gone on some form of social report. He hadn't actually been charged with anything, but had gone a bit off the rails for a while as a youngster (a minor) when his single mum had died. I think he'd had a fight in his school playground. He'd pulled himself round, disassociated from the bad company he'd been keeping, and gone on to study successfully and pass exams with flying colours.
There was tale after tale like this, where CRB results were used against people for the flimsiest of reasons.
The only thing I know about Piers is that he's a smarmy sod - didn't he get away with tax fraud or something?