Progressivism 87.5
Socialism 62.5
Tenderness 53.125

Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a university professor. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a generally optimistic attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a liberal.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a considerate pragmatist with few strong convictions.

Progressivism 82.5
Socialism 75
Tenderness 59.375

Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a university professor. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a generally optimistic attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a humanist.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a considerate pragmatist with several strong convictions.

This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.

Jane I just skipped the first page you don't have to complete it

So far each of us has the comment ' It appears that you are skeptical towards religion'


p.s what do the scores actually mean? Is there a pass or fail or if I get less than 100% on each area, will you think less of me?

Progressivism 82.5
Socialism 93.75
Tenderness 65.625

Your test scores indicate that you are a tender-minded ultra-progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a university professor. It appears that you are tolerant towards religion, and have a compassionate and sympathetic attitude towards humanity in general.

Your attitudes towards economics appear communist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a cultural marxist.

To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, a considerate realist with an established worldview.

This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.


The only answer I changed here was the one about did God create the universe

knobmeup wrote:
It's probably a profiling site set up by Psketti ... umm, I mean the CIA, which links the profile to the IP address, server provider, and therefore your home address and bank account details. Nothing to worry about if like me you've already sent emails to the CIA ... well, to be completely honest, I sent emails to the Whitehouse, the Vatican and a bunch of other places that may have me already on a watched listing, especially if you include the one to the Israeli government.

AND YES, cannabis is an herb ... pharmaceuticals are drugs.

dawnbreak wrote:
Yeah its not really of much use or insight into what sort of person you are.
Al lot of us probably have a low bullshit tolerance hence no time for religion or authority in general.

The political compass test is far better and even thats not as accurate as I'd like

dawnbreak wrote:
The first page was enough to put me off doing the rest of it Dawney!
However my curiosity was piqued, so I have had a look at page 2. I might have a go at it later...but 2 go's as if I'm in a very 'radical' mood (read angry) it will have a very different result to when I am 'centred'.....actually...might do it 3 times and do it if I'm pissed too....that should be a laugh and confuse any 'data collectors' as to what they are dealing with when it comes to me!

File update


Jane suffers from multi-personality disorder is female.

feather wrote:
Oh....you noticed!

I think you have to do it with a pinch of salt. The foreign aid question was one I couldn't easily give a 'yes' or 'no' answer for, the question is a bit more complex than that, there are a layer of assumptions underpinning that which I would suggest are largely incorrect. You're never going to have a perfect way of testing people's values, but I think this one probably does work out quite well.

wake_up_bomb wrote:
Correct, we could for example send foreign aid in the form of physical help and direct food resources or water etc instead of monetary aid.
I left my answer in the middle too because of that.

wubs i only changed my second answers by adding god in


I went from
Progressivism 82.5
Socialism 75
Tenderness 59.375


to



Progressivism 82.5
Socialism 93.75
Tenderness 65.625


So this leads me to believe that Socialists believe in God? In terms of this questionnaire

(I do believe in a god or higher power )

dawnbreak wrote:
Yeah, its stupid because some of the most right wingnut people around are religious freaks.
/points at the american religious right
/points at hardline jihadists

IMHO the less religious you are the more liberal you will tend to be so they have their wires crossed there for sure.

Again there's a lot more to religion than a simple yes/no answer too. There are religious people such as Mikey who are obviously liberal but they actually go for what Jesus actually preached rather than what the church and religious 'media' might establish as the viewpoint.
The same can be said of certain moderate muslims too.

Generally speaking though IMHO followers of religion will also follow authority- eg Romans XIII.

Its ironic to think that Jesus himself ticks a lot of anarchist boxes, yet the church supports the state

I'd hate to be called Liberal

Liberal to me means wishy washy cant make their minds ups

Ahh but remember Matthew was a former tax collector andy.
Jesus might have used him to hide all his offshore and hedge fund investment shenanigans.

He may have gone walkabout in shabby chic but had a wardrobe back at his crib that would shame Emelda Marcos.

dawnbreak wrote:
Thats the American media definition Dawn, which shows just how effective they are at destroying the English language.

The dictionary definition of liberal is generous,forgiving,tolerant and of noble birth and education...
Antonyms for liberal are closed minded, bigoted, fascist, ignorant, intolerant, racist etc.

The media have done a good number on you, which was the intent all along. Get people to reject the very word 'liberal'.

Another word that they have tried to destroy is anarchy and another one is terrorism which the dictionary has defined as a form of governance through terror...think about that one

I have a very informative video about this that explains it al very well. See below.
Only 15 mins or so and its very eye opening.



Bear in mind what is explained about 'fallacies'.

wake_up_bomb wrote:
Do you accept that the initiation of force is always wrong?
Y/N

There you go, a perfect way of testing peoples values, the only thing that matters is whether you are willing to use force to inflict your ideas on other people.

I'm going on the uk version of liberal

Didn't do what's his face any favours


Nick Clegg I couldn't even remember his name I had to google it

Wonderful colation bring on Scottish Independence

Reptired wrote:
Agreed. If the questions are worded correctly there is no need for a sliding scale. You either believe there is a God or you don't. Any grey area is the result of being human