Now I know why I can't edit the Fukushima story!

(whomever dom.sharp is has locked it for me)

psketti wrote:
Link?
What do you mean, link?

To when you 'told us' but nobody listened...

psketti wrote:
Well there's about 5000+ posts on the 'TPV' thread, I'm not going to spend three hours looking for it, but it was when 'cowboy' was hanging about being that way that he was, I thort that he was Seanx in disguise and posted that hus USE of UPPER case was like SEANX'S posts, and I made a link to a DIF thread in relation to SEANX and it was noted that 'cousin_frothy' had been on that very thread?

some conversation followed about why couisin_frothy might have been the way that he was perceived on SZ? and why another poster had taken offence to a comment made by knoebmeup and fucked off...just then.

I had over the space of three or four posts explained why 'cousin_frothy' may had been the way that he was, funny that eh, as he was gone before I arrived?

You were all to busy Icke bashing to note this information.

Blue_Tackler wrote:

Should we now....

Here's the thing - as I've already told you, if we choose to ignore this and let it pass because you've 'settled in', we leave the door open for any twat and their dog to try the same and then call foul, when we have none of it.

The fact that we likely called it wrong the first time you were here, is neither here nor there now as this has become a completely seperate issue.

Blue_Tackler wrote:

Actually, I do believe you'll find that I wasn't doing any such thing due to not even being here...

(EDIT - seems I came back just after your 'revelation' of sorts)

I am however, noting things now if its any consolation.

psketti wrote:
Is now a time for words or action?

Actually I do recall a bit of that convo.

At no time did you indicate you were cousin_frothy.
In fact you spoke of him in the 3rd person.

Link

Blue_Tackler wrote:

In regards to what?

feather wrote:
quite right, I was merely alluding, I thought that that was obvious?

If I came back here and said ''oh there was someone called 'blue_tackler' was there, would you not wonder why I had homed in on such a name?

Blue_Tackler wrote: Still a bit of a stretch from that to "I told them about a month ago but nobody listened. "

psketti wrote:
Cutting my carrot :

feather wrote:
I would have spotted that, I thought that's how he was mentioned, after all it was not me that brought it up was it, it was me that went on about it 'afterwards'.
If you don't see, you don't see. I did think you had seen.

Goldenprince13 wrote:
Oh yeah, woofwoofwoofwoof

hardly.

psketti wrote:
The embolden weighs massively in this decision.

Blue_Tackler wrote: See my problem with that is that you shift the onus onto folks here for them not noticing your 3rd party references was actually you telling us it was you.

Instead of doing the upfront thing which would have been to appeal your initial banning and (probably), return honestly through the front door.
You've created a situation there was no call for and now you put the facilitators/mods in an awkward position which I've yet to see any kind of apology or acceptance of responsibility for.

feather wrote:
And if it were shown that a mistake had been made by mods/facilitators - would/should the same courtesy apply?

feather wrote: Come on, it was obvious.



Sorry, I'm not being very helpful.