more fuckin proof for barnfish!
youknowwhokilledyoudontyou.blogspot.co.u...ocent-nearly-60.html
Sunday, March 4, 2012
Ian Huntley Is he Innocent ? :Nearly 60 closed circuit television cameras went operational here the first week of March.
In the annals of British legal history, in is unlikely that any other Queens Counsel has shot himself through the foot quite so severely with a single long-winded statement like this. Latham’s words are the exact opposite of reality where Huntley is concerned, and this press release dated March 2002 and authorized by Lieutenant Chris Watt of USAF Lakenheath, proves why.
What the press release does not mention is that on the same date, USAF Lakenheath personnel mounted additional armed patrols inside and outside the perimeter wire, 24 hours per day, every day including Sundays and public holidays.
“Operated by handpicked, trained security forces 24 hours a day, AT/FP CCTV allows security forces to monitor more than forty camera views at once.” In fact, said Kendall, the system has already been used to reduce the time it takes to apprehend drivers that run the gates.
“We can follow gate-runners with the cameras and record their actions until our forces catch up with them,” said Kendall. “Recording a gate-runner’s actions also helps us monitor a suspect for anti-terrorism and force protection activities.” RAF Lakenheath is the first base in U.S. Air Forces in Europe to install an AT/FP CCTV system, said Kendall.”
Remember that the 60 anti-terrorist cameras were switched on, and the extra patrols started, a full five months before Ian Huntley is accused of “dumping” Holly and Jessica’s bodies into a water-filled drainage ditch, itself within easy range of Lakenheath’s “always-on” infra-red-capable day and night video cameras.
It actually gets worse than this, far worse. If you look at the detailed maps and photographs of the airfield carefully, you will notice that the “crime scene” is very close to one end of the active runway, and thus constitutes a suitable firing point for a shoulder-launched “terrorist” surface to air missile.
The USAF pays special attention to such areas, with cameras available at all times for their detailed surveillance, with video footage archived for later examination of possible suspects.
Latham’s claim that, “whoever dumped the bodies knew it would be a suitable place to hide them and they would be unlikely to be caught in the act” is absolutely correct, provided that the culprit knew the precise layout of the anti-terrorist security cameras, their exact fields of view, and the precise timing of the armed patrols around the Lakenheath perimeter.
Whoever it was had access to the anti-terrorist operations schedules, indicating a very high security clearance.
Perhaps now the Home Office will be prepared to tell the British public why it failed to take action in this regard, and instead decided to deliberately psychologically abuse and “fit up” a man known to be innocent of any crime.
Placed in all areas around RAF Lakenheath and RAF Feltwell, the anti-terrorism force protection cameras give the 48th Security Forces Squadron increased ability to deal with force protection issues and add another layer of security and safety to the base.
“Now one man can cover several positions at once,” said Master Sgt. Jim Kendall, 48th SFS police services NCOIC. “The new system augments the forces that we already have in place.”...read more
www.whale.to/b/trial_of_ian_huntley.html
Because the camera fields of view are adjusted on a daily basis, and the timing of the patrols altered constantly for security reasons, the only culprits capable of dumping the bodies in the drainage ditch without getting caught, would be an American [or Americans] inside USAF Lakenheath, and not just anyone.
youknowwhokilledyoudontyou.blogspot.com/...untley-innocent.html “Nearly 60 closed circuit television cameras went operational here the first week of March.
