www.odt.co.nz/campus/university-otago/27...ld-dictate-jail-time


It won't be notes coming home with little johhny saying he's showing signs of rebelious behaviour ...
it will be little Johhny will be getting 25 years to life,

Gattaca, eugenics, the whole 9 yds.

Right, thanks for coming to this lecture this evening, everyone. You can't include genetics in the criminal justice system in an ethical way, even if the subject is fully understood, which it isn't, this should be self-evident to anyone with half a brain. Thanks again for coming, have a good journey home.

wake_up_bomb wrote:
...provided the lecturer indeed him/herself had half a brain.

abs the way you look in those jeans should be criminal

hey you know who doesn't have potential to do terrible things.
this precrime stuff is such bullshit.

Might add this to the Who's Who in the case file sub forum. The guy giving this lecture and has his photot in the article linked is this guy.
and author of this book

In this book reviewed here has all the hallmarks of apologetics for Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preimplantation_genetic_diagnosis

He is a full blown eugenicist.

now there's a surprise eh mikey.
in a sane world it would be these clowns that did bird. in this world they get funded by the big criminals...

The other guy mentioned in the article is this fella.
Julian Savulescu is Uehiro Professor of Practical Ethics at the University of Oxford, Fellow of St Cross College, Oxford, Director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics,

He is author of Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children



Here he is telling you his ideas like:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Savulescu#Writings_and_ideas

wake_up_bomb wrote:
Ethics are arbitrary, at least in most philosophical systems, because almost all philosophical systems ( correctly pseudo-philosphhical systems ) are not based on a Universally Preferable Behaviour. Universally being the operative word. Often times pseudo-philosphhical systems are outcome based, i.e.

"I want to do this, how can I get other people to allow it?."

I understand what you are saying and I'm not correcting you , I just think this is an important thing to point to.



Leaving all the Moral/Ethical/Logical arguments and contradictions aside for a moment, havn't the dreams of the Eugenecists based on Empirical evidence of Genetic Predetermination been completely destroyed by Epigenetics, like decades ago?

This false justification for evil and irrational actions has been the story of at least the last few thousand years, it's fascinating to see how the narrative is just slightly altered to update it with cultural/technological memes.

John Taylor gatto traces it from Plato in his video series.

www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL463AA90FD04EC7A2

https://www.globalresearch.ca/world-evolutionary-humanism-eugenics-and-unesco/9477

Reptired wrote:
Yes.
Unfortunately the media have yet to catch up.