That video is completely political, that guy uses emotional rhetoric to basically point out Holmes looked like a freak, unhinged, nutjob etc therefore must have been an asset, then goes into Right Wing Economic rants about punishing the bankers

For someone who is trying not to be political you certainly post a lot of political material..

Guevarista wrote:
That's just it though, there are all kinds of facts that weren't reported in the MSM, that are coming out. I certainly don't consider the MSM any kind of bastion of truth, if you do, whatever floats your boat. And on this site, we are free to post how we feel, given all the reports. conventional and otherwise. Maybe this thread is for you, maybe the videos in the OP will help you to glean something different. Or, maybe not huh?

Guevarista wrote:
I can see how you were confused then. I wasn't trying to be political, and one of the above videos shows how important Holmes father is, and how he was testifying in a trial against some banksters. That's relevant, IMO, as to why Holmes may have been picked to either be a killer, or a patsy. OK? I'm here to help those who don't understand the point of the thread.

Well in the video above the guy says himself he has zero evidence, just a few reactions and judgements based on hearsay and what James Holmes looks like.
some comments:
Was the video I posted MSM?

What are these facts you speak of, what are their sources?
Let's have a list of five key facts that lead you to believe this was a "staged event".

Guevarista wrote:
Refer to the excellent thread in the Todays News section called Shooting in Colorado. Enjoy yourself. Why should I have to "prove" my opinion to you? You either agree, or you don't. You apparently don't. Next?

EDIT: Some comments are party line, some go against the grain. Next?

Ok I'll go to the thread, I'm just asking you in the absence of Dave Mustaine really, since you said you agree with him and I can't ask him to substantiate the wild theories that you posted.

Guevarista wrote:
There you go, I'm all over that thread. You can add your opinion to that too. Oh, and the way I see it, Dave Mustaine agrees with me. And you can ask him, via Twitter. You can also post with everyone else's comments on the NY Times, or blabbermouth.net. Show 'em what you got, gue!

mikey mikey wrote:
Corrected the misquote! We really need a cock sucker smiley.

Frog wrote:
out with the merlincove and in with the Frog

Would some care to explain to me exactly what has happened here ^ please?
In a fresh thread if needs be. Thankyou

dubmeup wrote:
Try reading the thread and see if you can work it out. It really isn't hard to spot and hardly warrants a dedicated thread or further derailment of this thread.

Frog wrote:
So basically you can't offer any reasonable explanation, can you?

What's next? A ban on discussing moderation?

dubmeup wrote:
Ditto.

ronisron wrote: mikey mikey wrote:
mikey left out ron's rolleyes...bugged Frog a bit, Frog corrected it...suggested we need a cocksucker smiley for people who deliberately misquote posts...to misquote a post...humour? Ego? Who gives a fuck

Anyway. You are a soulless scumbag corporate arsehole who wants to enslave the world...America is a big piece of the NWO takeover jigsaw...all those pesky Americans who own guns might get in the way of your plans when you try to militarise the nation, when you try to bring in martial law/police state...you need to disarm the American people to make the transition from free country to fascist state much easier. How would you go about it?

irrepressible wrote:
Not too hard to work out now was it?

I'm not coming down on anyone's side btw. It's just one of those forum rubbing up the wrong way moments as far as I can gather They happen...been involved in a few myself I'm sure you's'll get over it

irrepressible wrote:
Sure about that, cos Froggy just posted this my way (look above)
Frog wrote:
And I am getting baited by a mod.

Happy days are here again!

irrepressible wrote:
Firstly, frog was just trying to point out mikey's lame attempt at thread derailment.

Secondly, that's exactly right. How would you? Staging a bunch of false flags, propaganda, and finally a move to disarm the people "for their own safety". It really is that simple.

Oh ffs

Well, look, I don't think Frog should have sent that emoticon your way mikey. I also don't think you should have misquoted ron's post, I've had that done to me and it does nothing but piss me off. Even if it's done in humour it can still be highly annoying.

Anyway fuck this shit, why am I getting involved? You's can either sort it out or become forum "enemies" constantly back biting and bitching at each other. It's up to you's

ronisron wrote:
Devastatingly simple as Icke once put it.

I suppose it depends if you believe there's an NWO/Globalist agenda. Say for arguments sake there is a global military/corporate/fascist takeover, it doesn't take a massive leap in logic to work out how they would go about doing it.

If that is indeed what's happening, then staging gun massacres would be the only way to go about disarming the American people. I'm still on the fence as far as the colorado shootings are concerned, random shit does happen unfortunately. Either way, it's interesting, and should be questioned and debated.