Rick wrote:
So is he hung like Luke the government mule or not, I don't see any graphic content?
Alas, I suspect not, Rick. But then...who am I to judge? I'm sure there is probably some ancient rule about not depicting Royal penis, somewhere.
And in response to those who say they are undecided re the privacy issue, do you not think it appropriate that this kind of behaviour should at least be given careful consideration regarding one's 'station' in life, and the benefits that may entail?
For example, I'm regularly to be found off my tree outside some dingy nightclub with everything on show and sleeping in foliage. Do I care if anyone sees my meat and two? Not a jot. Ask me, and I'll gladly show you. Sometimes, I'll show you even if you don't ask.
This man, again, considering who he is, really should care, imo. Yes, he is young and impulsive and evidently living his life to the fullest, so more power to him. Can't really turn round and grumble if someone snaps you in the nuddy, though, can you? Not when you've stripped off in a room or bar full of other people, all of whom doubtless possess the latest in digifuckery.
As to getting in trouble with the army, well, again I doubt it, given who he is. If he does, well then my heart bleeds. Cry me a fucking ginger river.
(I'm allowed to say that, as I'm 'auburn')
No I think even so called royals are just human,and if humans are naturally like this which they are,and if they feel confident about themselves,nudity isn't a big deal, or running around naked with fellow adults.
But human young folks should be shielded with severe laws to protect them from naked people, until they can decide intelligently about this subject
especially with skin on skin contact 
it's just,,, 
And the hair...Henry VIII 
