I can't see any resemblance to Charlie whatsoever - he's the spitting image of James to my eye.

Anyway - should he have privacy? Seems only decent to say yes.

Should he be spread across the press in all his nakedness because he's ginger & 'royal'. Hmmmm - yes.

The 3rd possibility is that he's highly delighted for these pic's to come out, because he's an exhibitionist, and wants to project the image that he's a good old, red blooded male.

Gilly wrote:
Me thinks you have it figured out

Good PR...you see that people, the royals are cool.

novum wrote:

Do you mean the queens corgis are cool

Ab Origine wrote:
G'day Abs.

Thanks mate.
diamondgeezer wrote: Ab Origine wrote: Gilly wrote:
OI !!!

There's something that requires stating here in relationship a common thread in your posts, which I'll leave to the talented Tim Minchen ...

I've just got one word to say.

Weasley

('Royal' pubes aside, I find ginger hair very attractive in reality).

Gilly wrote:
G'day Gilly.

I had to google "Weasley" as I didn't get what you were referring to ... still don't actually. This may be because I have neither read or watched the Harry Potter material.

But ...

"Only a ginger, can call another ginger, ginger"

Out with the old in with the new...

Long live King Harry...

bit of shame really when it's front page news.................oh his granny will be so dissappointed

The paper that published it is the Sun .....Murdoch , If Rupert Murdoch was still best buddies with the Royals/Governement the pictures would never have made the light of day

I don't like the Royals but I think it is a bit out of order publishing photots of a young lad having fun despite where he hails from

ARGH!!! My eyes, they bleeeeeeeed!

What a truly horrible specimen of "man" he is. I wonder if he never stops to wonder why so many women are always so ready to cavort with His Rich And Powerful Highness????

RealAmerican wrote:
The top row, he looks like Hewitt. In the bottom...not sure he resembles, either.

i always find it weird that people think you have to look like your parents?

I look a wee bit like my mum , but I don't think anyone would pull us out as mother and daughter in a crowded room

dawnbreak wrote:
Generations can skip...What I mean is my step uncle looked exactly like his nan, they could have almost been twins

lol


Im brunette , my son's dad is brunette .......two very brown haired people. My son was ginger for the first 2 months

He now has a lovely deep auburn/chestnut colour but he'll never be brunette

perhaps I shagged James Hewitt

dawnbreak wrote:
My best friend and hubby are both brown haired/brown eyed and had a blonde haired/blue eyed little girl that looks more like me than either of them! I joke that she had a little girl for me.

I'm not saying he's Hewitt's kid; he just looks like him at that angle with the same smile and a similar nose. I know jack shit about the "royalty" and who their relatives are, who looks like who, ect. Harry's kinda cute in a devilish sort of way. Charles looks like an inbred freak!

I feel a bit sorry for harry

dawnbreak wrote:
Man, you are so lucky you get a Mogwai! I'm green with envy!

I know !!! no idea how he is there in the emoticon things but I'm not complaining ........it's gizmo

dawnbreak wrote:
I used to have a Gizmo plush as a child; always wished he was real! Too damn cute! Much cuter than Harry...and yet hairier!

dawnbreak wrote:
Don't be, he is already a better statesman than the rest of the Royal Family combined.

diamondgeezer wrote:
I heard that.


Anyway, I think the big deal is that he's the prince, otherwise why would the pictures be published - if they are genuine?

Even without pix we could assume he was the same as anyone else.

If you prick us, do we not bleed?
If you tickle us, do we not laugh? If you poison us,
do we not die? And if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?
If we are like you in the rest, we will resemble you in that.

-The Merchant of Venice