Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development
Imagining the Future
The Rockefeller Foundation and The Global Business Network / May 25, 2010 / Publications

The Rockefeller Foundation have printed a document which contains a prediction that there will be 13000 deaths as a result of an incident at the 2012 Olympics. The full pdf is available here www.rockefellerfoundation.org/news/publi...os-future-technology .

Here is an image of the section where the prediction is presented...

Your comments on the documents contents and the terminology used etc. would make interesting reading.

They seem to be fantasizing...

Omnisense wrote: If you read the whole passage, it is pretty much just one social engineering wet dream. This is the last sentence of the so-called 'hack attack' scenario:

Omnisense wrote:
Can you imagine the reaction that document and in particular that paragraph would have if it were written by a small business or Muslim community group? One rule for organisations like Tavistock, Rothschild and Rockefeller foundations and a totally different rule book for any organisation or individual outside.

it's a meaty document.I'm going to have to read through it all to be able to comment. They seem to be getting leveling the playing field between rich and poor nations in terms of economics and quality of life. What do you think? I'm just about to start on the scenarios.

wake_up_bomb wrote:
I only skimmed the pdf but the terms and language used are staggering these people are seriously sick in the head and yet they are the quangos and think tanks pulling the strings of power.

LesleyPumpshaft wrote:
I haven't had a chance to sit and read through the document properly yet and to be honest I really can't justify the time it would take right now. I would be interested to hear your views or those of others who would like to share their thoughts on the contents.

Frog wrote: I just skim read the contents of the section which you're referring to. It's hard to comment on the legitimacy of the Olympics prediction, as no background is given for this whatsoever. There are many scenarios within it which are speculative, but I think the very last section is absolutely where the social engineers wish to take us:
Particularly the bolded sentence.

Tbh I'm going to have to do it in dribs and drabs.

Thanks for starting this thread Frog.

I wonder why the PTB are letting us see this stuff ?

The document seems to be a directive which "suggests" scenarios that can be used in order to get their agenda from A to B and eventually to Z with the use of false flag attacks which they refer to as "scenarios". Problem Reaction Solution.

Apparently Adolf Hitler and his buddies would vaguely "suggest" things in a similar way, and he would assign people to push the agenda forward. And the rest is history.

Interestingly in the Lock Step scenario about a global pandemic this has be written...

That sound rather like what happened because of 911.

There is a section in there which says basically that people no longer trust vaccines because some vaccines were tained and people stopped taking up the vaccinations, and this leads to more deaths because the vaccines were not taken up.

LesleyPumpshaft wrote:
Reagan gives us the heads up in this speech - He says "Those who would trade our freedom for security....". In the same speech he goes onto say that if Americans lose their freedom, there will be no place left on earth to hide (NWO)

Steevo wrote:
The reason is because they are arrogant c**ts...the upside of that is that we know they are arrogant c**ts and their arrogance is what's bringing them down as we type. They are actually the architects of their own destruction.

I don't think it was history it was simply one of a series of continuous step along the road to global tyranny. The British and Americans were responsible for the second world war, they were also responsible for many of the major atrocities that took place. Hitlers efforts were minor by comparison but when the victors are controlling the written history they can present any shit they like as historical fact. That doesn't mean that people accept that history as a matter of fact. The people behind Hitler and the Anglo American establishment never changed or went away, so it's hardly surprising to see how things have panned out since then,

Is there a decade where the British government haven't been engaged in military action somewhere in the world in the last 150 or so years?

Looking at their website and the pdf file, the whole thing reads as cheeky deceit.

Their involvement in rebuilding New Orleans sounds like a very controlled inhuman experiment, to me, when you read between the lines.

In the PDF file, the letter from Judith Rodin, the President of the Rockefeller Foundation, contains this paragraph:

The words "to promote the wellbeing" of humanity are deliberately put in quotation marks.

They are partnered with the Bill Gates Foundation and Monsanto in "improving" farming in Africa, but it sounds more like Africa is being used as a "test" continent.

Rockefeller also funds T4America. On the surface you would think that T4America is an organization designed to improve transportation. They talk about the decaying infrastructure of roads and bridges and the need for something new. Here is a video by T4America
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61GacCz_OPM

The problem, as I see it, is that they would like to do away with people's liberties and ability to travel. I believe that they want to take away our vehicles and fill the roads with checkpoints, BEFORE a solution is fully implemented.

I might be biased though, because I have had some nightmares about this, but somewhere on their website it said that for the lower to middle class now spends 30% of their income on transportation (vehicle, insurance, gas, parking, and it could be that was the plan all along.


As far as their futurespeak, when they talk about the Olympics, that is very strange and does sound like wishful thinking on their part. At least that is how I read it.

LesleyPumpshaft wrote:
The roll out of the EU and consolidation of the Northern alliance. The clamp down on the internet and increased surveillance of civilians.

Engineered flu and other viruses, state sponsored terrorism, Harrp, chem trails, engineered financial collapse and out sourcing.

The governments ignored the objections from the population about the unpatriotic and treasonous acts committed by their governments.

No one gave up anything and certainly not willingly - sovereignty and privacy has only been temporarily removed.

Leaves you wondering what the real reason was for 9-11 and what powers were behind the execution of the scheme.

It seems like Noel Edmonds isn't the only subscriber to the faith of 'cosmic ordering' he just never did his on such a grand scale.

I was just trying to be positive when I said that. All of the symbolism in the advertising, etc., and even the Illuminati playing card with Big Ben, and the colors of the olympics, etc. etc. are unsettling.

In my opinion, Big Money makes too much cash from the Olympic scam to scupper it with a stunt.

LesleyPumpshaft wrote:
This is Ted Turner stuff.
Basically the line of thinking goes like this...if you increase the wealth of the poorer nations then you can control the population more easily via education and consumerism and you can keep the fertility rate down.