A while back a white foul mouth racist went on a rant now another racist foul mouth does a rant.

Further proof that skin colour has zero effect on intelligence and provides no excuse for acting like an arse.

She does make a good point about the jubilee and the Queen wearing African diamonds in her Crown.

Her throat's going to be awfully sore in the morning.

I think she may be a tad intoxicated

Who's holding the phone? Seems well shot...why didn't she say anything like "stop fahkin' filmin'!" Unless she didn't notice...These train/tram rants are quite popular these days...

It's a CONSPIRACY!!

A fad I think they call it. Oddly my sound is not working right now so all I can tell is that she is angry about something. Maybe I can comment better once I reboot.

irrepressible wrote:
Just a bit.

I wonder though....will she be prosecuted for her racist rant and end up in prison like Emma West did?

diamondgeezer wrote:
There is no child involved for one so the case is not the same.

diamondgeezer wrote: I think you may have just stolen Nirv's punchline.


If they are going to use the law as applied to emma west then I see no reason why they couldn't do the same here.
They are/were both at least drunk and disorderly but it's the racist angle that's central eh?

It'll be interesting. Precedent has been set.

Plus of course there was an alleged assault in the Emma West case and I assume somebody would have to press charges otherwise nobody would really care. It seems people in this video are mostly laughing at the drunk woman rather than anybody taking it personally.

i-baster wrote:
Not on the woman's knee as in the case of West, no. But how about on the rest of the bus, other young children nearby who could have been just as endangered?

So really, not that much difference eh.

diamondgeezer wrote:
Right but I don`t see any kids present and certainly not on her knee. The atmosphere is much different. Yes it would not be a great site for a child or anybody but most people are just laughing. Unless there is a child present, and I do not see one, then it is not the same.

i-baster wrote:
Sorry but no.

''The atmosphere is much different''? Does that make her actions/intent any more excusable than West's?

Nope.

feather wrote:
Always one, ain't there?

Now you are putting words in my mouth. Like I said before it is a rant that is racist in nature and abusive but the people around her don`t seem too intimidated or worried. If a child were involved then yes it would be a much different situation and atmosphere. If you were on the train/tram or bus and felt offended then sure you could report her to the police. Otherwise it is just another video on the internet.

I blame public transport...and Rosa Parks.

nirvana wrote:
What do you mean by how much privacy do we have? I think this is obviously in a public place. If you want privacy you should probably not be shouting in public whether you shout "white cunt" or "white power".

oioioi wrote:
Yeah. Bitch.

oioioi wrote:
Are the Rosa parks along the same bus route?