dantesrevival wrote: This would be a perfect description.

I know from personal experience, I spoke to Tinyint. And I will look at anything with an open mind, and he was very insistent about the validity of his views. I'm not an expert on history, but I know a fair bit, and he'd stated that Hitler was democratically elected, and I said that isn't true, he received a significant portion of the vote in an election, but he was never elected to the position of leader. And he said "no, you need to look at these German documents, you're just following Western propaganda", or words to that effect. So I said, "okay, show me the documents then. Let's overlook the fact that my German is at about a 3 year-old level!". So he sent me one, and it completely backed up what I said, and completely contradicted him. I even translated it on Google translate and posted the translation. Didn't change his view in the slightest, I assure you!

There is no reasoning with Tinymind. You could irrefutably prove him wrong, but he'll just come back & post the same bullshit again & again.
He's a proven liar, not worth wasting time on. Even though I'm sure most of us have!

Space Bandit wrote: He proved himself wrong and he still didn't change his mind!

wake_up_bomb wrote:


He's one of those to tie himself in knots & then vanish for a bit.

I kinda miss arguing with those guys... which is slightly psychologically worrying.
From a personal perspective, it's good that everybody started to get banned & this place was invented or I'd still be getting drawn into pointless arguments with weirdos like KOTG going on about 'cum smothered babies' or whatever other bizarre analogy he found somehow relevant - instead of me getting on with my actual life!

Space Bandit wrote:

Tinybrain seems to believe he's the only person in the entire world who speaks German. This means anything in German automatically means what he wants it to mean.

I don't miss that clown one jot. He'll post something - you point out why it's bullshit. He ignores you and posts it again. You point out why it's bullshit. He ignores you and posts it again. On and on and on.

andyh wrote:
He reached an all time low with that one eh?
Cunt!

Space Bandit wrote:
lol I made him squirm for it though :p

tinyint was bluffing you with the German thing so well done for calling it.

he's temporaily suspended btw

socked up no doubt

Holocaust deniers.

Here is Spielberg's The Last Days in full



And here is the denier film 'debunking' it....



I'd be interested in people's opinion/s regarding the latter, if anyone can manage all 2 hrs of it.

The latest bile from tinykint

On the day after Aaron Swatz's suicide, he posts...

And it is still there

Fine mods at DIF doing there job protecting the forum from accusations of prjudice and hatred .

Well done Sean and Alison you fucking heartless cunts.

Well when it comes to anti semetism, the DIF has always been liberal hasn't it.

diamondgeezer wrote:
It has been downright mandatory, DG.

I have given up hoping that Icke has no part in it.

Leaving that out there while people grieve for a 26 year old suicide is fucked up.

Beyond contempt Sean and Alison ytou miserable horrible evil fucks.

mikey mikey wrote:
'Jew York' LOL!!



They should just rename it the blame game circle jerk forum.

mikey mikey wrote:
Oh absolutely
He knows exactly what he's doing just as AJ and Ventura know exactly what they're doing

diamondgeezer wrote:
Eric Cunt? I certainly couldn't manage two hours of that. But one thing I'm aware it does do is show how intellectually redundant these fuckwits are with the Irene Zisblatt thing. She's a confused old lady who published a book with a vanity publishing company who - not unusually - mixed up actual wartime experience with wildly exaggerated/imagined/conflated with stuff she's seen or heard elements mixed in. She's never had any value as a witness (she's cited nowhere) and the historical value of her testimony is non existent. Steven Spielberg was badly sloppy to use her - but he's a bigshot Hollywood director who spends his time making big budget overly sentimental films. It's a total waste of time to attack her because in witness terms she's a nobody. It's a bit like somebody claiming the Vietnam war never happened because some old guy gives a confused and wildly inaccurate account of his tour of duty on the Oprah Winfrey Show. It kind of demonstrates the denier preoccupation with mass media because they can never be arsed to read the actual historical literature and their apparent failure to understand any big event throws up all kinds of people saying all kinds of things from pretty accurate recollections to total bullshit. In fact, deniers have this really strange idea that witnesses are either infallible or they're liars proppoing up the hoax - with the credible witnesses they spend hours trying to pick out inconsistencies, exaggerations, distortions etc apparently failing to realise that witnesses routinely give less than perfect accounts in any situation for all kinds of well understood reasons. This is why sensible people put multiple accounts together and find the commonalities which are then compared against other types of evidence.

Quite the youtube channel that turned out to be, dogsmilk.

mikey mikey wrote:
Icke's position is contingent on whether he really believes everything he says. At face value his position is ambiguous because he recycles standard Jewish conspiracy theories, repackages them and presents them as not being Jewish conspiracy theories but meaning something different.

Indeed dogsmilk.

I did actually watch all of it, and basically it takes things totally out of context with some clever selective editing and more than a few untruths thrown in to boot.

diamondgeezer wrote:
I admire your patience LOL