angelchemuel wrote:
You'd be post-war gym-slip.

Don't be so restricted by something like lunar cycles of sexual experience!

angelchemuel wrote:
What the fuck are you on about?

(yes its DG, posting on ozzy's account)

You know exactly what I'm talking about Jim.....and I've quite frankly had enough of playing who's who around here for one day...just thank goodness I can smell a whiffy 'sock'....post as yourself you coward!
And stop sending your 'troops' in here to have a 'pop'.
You don't do yourself or TZ any favours or justice.
Goodnight y'all

Jane

angelchemuel wrote:
Got to dispute that jane. I don't believe for a second DG had anything to do with today.

angelchemuel wrote:
I quite clearly am posting as myself jane...& for the record, your sock accusations aimed at me are bullshit, as can quite easily be proven.

Just as your accusation of me being Darkmoon/Resistance earlier in this thread was quite clearly bullshit.

Look, you mentioned my name first, with unfounded accusations, thinking you'd get away with it cause I wasn't around to answer back.

So who's the coward eh...

same goes for me, i dispute that also, there are no 'troops' Jane, just individuals acting on their own free will and opinions.

Truth Zone is simply another choice and ive been on record before as stating that i for one dont want animosity between the sites.

For the record, I think accusing DG of sending people here to make trouble is well out of order.

Speaking of orders, id like to know why people think that individuals would follow orders from people running a site, just because those individuals happen to be signed up to said site.

Or that the people running said site would even give out orders and so on.

And im not just talking about TZ here, my comment is also relevant in regards to DIF mods and admin also, who were saying the same thing not so long ago, i found the notion laughable then and i still do.

People are going to do what they want to do as individuals, especially in this genre.

That's a good point, Nov. I know when I was at DIF Sean & I Am & I think Krakhead used to go snooping around ILF & GLP, but I never saw them command that anyone else to do it. It's possible that some individuals might think causing disruption on other sites will score them brownie points though.

To suggest that "certain people", let's face it, me, have been sent over here by people to cause ructions is an insult, not just to me, but to the people who are perhaps being accused. Same with "some individuals" from "other sites" scoring "brownie points". Why would I or anyone else give a crap about "brownie points"? And why would people hand them out?

I came here of my own volition. It had nothing to do with anyone else. It's not only ridiculous to suggest "being sent over", it's unfair. Leave other people out of it.

Col. Trautman wrote:
You dare still try to play the victim. Here's an insult to you. Fuck off, you whinging little shite-stirring bore.

The brownie points comment was about the DIF people, which is what I was talking about - pretty obvious, since I fucking said so. And yes, people like Merlincove, who tried to play both sides - in his words, be a 'double agent' - and said he aimed to be "I-Am's biatch", would definitely have played such games in the hope of achieving brownie points. He'd probably have got a pat on the head for doing it too.

Everything isn't always about you, you self-obsessed wanker.

You're a classy lady Gilly.

I'm not playing the victim, only victims play the victim. I am not a victim.

Btw, fair enough that you didn't mean me with the brownie points thing.

Col. Trautman wrote:
Well there's nothing very classy about you and your constant fucking self-pitying, psychologically disturbed, trouble-making dramas. I wish you'd sod off to TZ once and for all.

SC's weird little rant and her becoming a mod on TZ the next day....pure kwinkydinks then?

oioioi wrote:
sure i will answer that...

She was already a mod unoficially, and was also doing the articles on the sites headline page/front page. I gave her account backend access in a nutshell, and a few instructions on how to use the mod buttons and article publisher also.

I didnt have her tags set to say moderator though, and mine didnt either. I had her account set exactly like mine. Im not that comfortable with the 'moderator' tag tbh, thats why i had it not showing, i just wanted to appear and interact as a regular member there. My account here is actually set like that also, technically i have mod powers right at this moment, but its only for tech duties since im not a mod, so i changed the tag to that of a member.

it was a kwinky that DG then suggested we display our modship if you will, he just wanted users there to know who the mods were, nothing more to it than that. He made a post in admin about it, and i agreed to change the tags on mine and stars accounts.

Please compare her last posts and login date here, to the first articles she put up on TZ. She cant publish articles on TZ without elevated permissions...i had already given her those in January...

Headlines page: truth-zone.co.uk/headlines/latest-headlines.html?start=230

Articles page: truth-zone.co.uk/articles/article-catego...eneral-articles.html

Note the author, she wrote the articles herself, and note the dates.

When stars last visited here she did so on her own accord, it had nothing to do with myself or DG.

I wasn't suggesting she was prompted to, but the timing of a rant against mods not modding her and her becoming a mod was a little, well, interesting.

oioioi wrote:
I want to put up a screenie of the TZ admin too so we can all see how/why the tags were changed at that time, and it wasnt the only thing DG brought up, im happy to do so in order to clear things up...




As i said compare the article dates in the links above, she already had admin powers in january, and that includes over the forum.

DG starting that thread had nothing to do with stars postings and/or thoughts here. If anything he started it because the user colors werent set like here.

dogsmilk wrote:
I thought you would enjoy viewing that thread, did you not also admire their unity and seeing them march in perfect step and formation dm? And there was me thinking that you were a collectivist? They make the IDF look like a bunch of boy scouts and a shambles wouldn't you agree? I know where my money would go if there was a fair fight. You're right though, sticks and stones and all that. It's just I find it rather boring after a while, all the childish personal attacks I mean, it doesn't offend me in the least, it just reminds me of a bad rash that won't go away, and when you itch it gets worse. Nothing personal against you btw, I rather enjoyed some of our little dog fights and disputes, excuse the pun. And I guess I should also give admin some credit here for not banning me and allowing me to post here.

Darkmoon wrote:
Oh I see. So you've just dropped in to prove them right then.

Or are you going to prove them wrong?

If you don't want to make a contribution, why are you here?