Darkmoon wrote:
Why would we ban you for nothing?

My name ain't Sean

Darkmoon wrote:
Well personally watching people being mindlessly marched about is something I find mildly disturbing. It's indicative of the blind obedience to authority that makes people go and fight wars for some politician. My politics fall into the anarcho-syndicalist/anarchist communist camp, and I'm confused as to why you think I'd find such a thing appealing.

I think some people may be less than welcoming because they may have come here to get away from people like you. Indeed, in my personal opinion you are one of the more egregious specimens. Everything about you screams far right - and I've caught you checking yourself in the past when you realised you'd gone too far - but you pretend you're a cuddly rainbow liberal who just happens to think Hitler was awesome, Jews are wankers and the white race is in some kind of peril. The funny thing is, it shows that you know your politics are totally fucked up and/or you're a craven coward because you dance around your very obvious convictions.

Though I don't know why you'd assume you may have been banned. I don't see you've done anything to be banned for. On my part, it's kind of like being at a party when some nob walks in. You kind of roll your eyes and hope they won't be staying.

I would, however, be interested to hear about this apparent correlation between marching in formation and battlefield performance. I had previously been under the illusion that this was contingent on a multitude of factors such as morale, technology, logistics, terrain, intelligence, strategy and sheer luck. You can also put discipline in there, but that's a relatively fluid concept - ad hoc amateurs can be very disciplined if this is tied to high levels of determination, as can be seen with guerrilla forces who don't do much marching in formation.

I am therefore intrigued to discover the basis on which how impressive the North Korean army look when doing a marching display correlates directly to their predicted performance in actual conflict. In which case I would have to say I have no idea how they compare to the IDF as I have never viewed any footage of the IDF marching up and down the square.
It may be in your thread, I don't know. I only saw it yesterday after you turned up and I did a post search on the DIF to see if you'd been saying anything fun recently.

batou wrote:
I'm not entirely convinced about the situation in North Korea either way to be honest. I think it's quite interesting how the mass media have been making them public enemy number one recently. Neither am I convinced this recent ''nuclear threat'' being peddled by the media is the truth. It all kind of screams out to me that perhaps not everything is as it seems? A bit like Iraq, Libya, Syria etc. I don't know what to think about the situation if truth be told. It's folly to believe what the media is saying about them though in my opinion. There again maybe North Korea is a brutal dictatorship/? There's an interesting documentary though which came out of North Korea last year directed at the west and ''democracy'' in general. It's a propaganda film obviously, but nevertheless I think it picks up on a number of important points. Some of the information regarding world war II is also a bit fuzzy and non-factual, though you can forgive them for that I suppose, they've probably taken most of their information regarding the war from western history books.

so basically you dont know anything yet here is a movie entitled propaganda, which is propaganda and you want us to watch it and pick up the important points.

Darkmoon wrote:
Dubstep is pretty popular. If the West had wanted to demonise him, the video would have been more along the lines of Justin Bieber so the public would think North Korea is the kind of thing only 14 year old girls are into.

batou wrote:
Make of it what you will, watch it or don't watch it, I don't care eitherway tbh. Perhaps other people may find it interesting? Do you speak for everybody here or something?

yes i speak for everyone here

Yes it's true he does.

Here's a 1970s Soviet propaganda film. I don't know anything about it but I thought people might find it interesting for some reason.



They were demonised in the West, so they were the good guys. And there's some great marching which proves they were awesome on the battlefield.

I'm here to represent the internet....whilst slowly destroying it.

I'm just here cos gilly emailed me about the cleavage thread.

Sadly I can't see the pics on my mobile due to self imposed usage controls. I therefore feel both cheated and slightly dirty.

knobmeup wrote:
So, she really did try and get you back using my tits as bait

Bitch never even paid me. Just wait until she gets here tomorrow

humanspirit wrote:
I know what you're doing

pheony wrote:
If Zeph is now a mod at DIF he needs to stop back in here at SZ and explain why he has not deleted the doom threads there yet.

Why would he need to do that?
Who actually cares?

.......... wrote:
He really doesn't.

psketti wrote:
A deal's a deal. Skett. I promised him you'd post a full frontal, so when he's able to actually see it, you're legally & morally bound to oblige.

Gilly wrote:
I'm afraid Gilly is right Psketti, the law is the law.

Time to release to Corby 2.

Some here may not know that psketti had a crush on me back on the DI forum...She was also jealous

because I was always flirting with Magenta Mooncabbage ....just thought I'd post the truth....I think it will clear the air.... .