irrepressible wrote:
Irrie.... you're a moderator again. I've given you a good karma for it. Now bladdi keep it that way

cantata wrote:
Indeed this place was set up as a direct result of the problems we were not allowed to discuss over there - It has been set up with the best of intentions and values and thus far has worked as intended - but then what more did we expect other then this place to be demonised - I for one was in discussion with mods for years about the problems I have openly discussed here - to no avail - if anything though perhaps this will serve as a wake up call for those over there to come at least to have a look see what we are actually saying here.

thoreau wrote:

Way to take a ruddy gun and aim it at your foot sean!

One thing I do know is that there are some very switched on people over there still. They WILL have noticed the bannings. They WILL also have noticed WHO has been banned. Do you not think that people will suspect anything considering that you have now banned many long term, valued and prolific contributors? When people like phem, thoreau etc get banned, people take note..... You have just made them more inclined to come here and find out why you've been at it again. Idiot.

cantata wrote:
That I shall cantata

andyh wrote:
A match made in... well, I can't exactly say "heaven" can I?... but a match, anyway. Let's all hope they don't BREED.

@ dubs - ty I never really thought people took much notice of my posts over there apart from a select few.

He has shot himself in the foot - but people will buy what he is saying no doubt

thoreau wrote:
That's cos you is humble. ONE of the reasons I like the cut of your jib

thoreau wrote:
That piece you posted thor is an insult to the intelligence of the people he's addressing. "a tiny minority have been fooled into joining...". "if you've recieved a PM invite, please feel free to report it..."

I think the people who've been sent invites will judge for themselves sean

thoreau wrote:
Jeez...panic much?

DON'T LOOK BEHIND THE CURTAIN!!!

irrepressible wrote:
Increasing desperation. The mark of a despot in trouble

One would like to draw sean's attention to the bit about owners/members of other sites being banned. I wonder why you haven't taken such a stance with the visitors from aryan.net and stormfront for example. Who are plainly there to do exactly what you accuse us of.....

Its a total insult tbh - particularly as there is screenshot evidence and other such evidence to prove almost all of what has been said. But then he can hardly tell the truth which would look something along these lines....

Warning regarding invitations to join other forums
Have you been sent a PM inviting you to join another forum or website?

If so please be aware that a significant number of other forums/websites out there have been set-up by individuals with a personal axe to grind against me due to my hitler complex and inability to have an open and honest debate about the running of the forums, who are out to provide an alternative arena in which to come together as a community and spread some positivity

If you receive any correspondence from another member inviting you to a place you feel is at odds with this forum please feel free to report it to one of the moderators or admin team on this forum. You can do so by clicking on the red triangle with exclamation mark in the middle (located at the bottom left of the PM) or by simply forwarding the PM to one of the team. We do not wish to lose the revenue your participation here provides.

Over the years we've had numerous anti David Icke Forum/David Icke websites spring up and unfortunately a tiny minority of our members get fooled into joining them - more unfortunately I havent learnt from the feedback these people have tried to give me before I ban them so there is a cyclical reoccurance of people waking up to what a wanker I am. Many truths are usually spread about this place and about David in order to spread information to as many people as possible in the interests of transparency and honesty - I do not like or agree with this so I have changed the forum rules to accommodate my epeen - oops I mean banstick

The reason people were/are banned here is for saying stuff I didnt want others to know about the way I run things and my inconsistent approach to forum rules - I am arrogant

This is something we simply do not tolerate. (I read this and see that hitler rant video - someone with more skills then me needs to spoof it with sean as hitler finding out someone has said something negative about him - mods standing scared outside the door - am sure you know the one!!)

If you would like to discuss this off the forum via email feel free to email me at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. That way I can continue to keep this under wraps and out of the public domain - I will not tolerate transparency and accountability!!





On a side note I would love to know who the 'we' is he refers too.

thoreau wrote:
Now that would be class

thoreau wrote:

Brilliant stuff

cantata wrote:
precisely.

why cant someone else have a website?

the googlebots wont be kept out of here for much longer either

people can make up their own minds.



TBH i have thought about doing something like this years ago, though due to other time commitments and other reasons it never came to be. And not to make money off of it either, we already have enough of those, there are people that can see through all that and i am aware of that.

However when DG got the ball rolling earlier this year, and i saw others willing to help, i decided to put my hand up and assist, the timing felt right.

So they are being self centered once more over there, thinking a place like this is set up with the sole purpose of spiting them.

get over yourselves dudes.

irrepressible wrote:
Now he is saying that people who arent monogamous to brand 'Icke' online have been fooled.

What if the reality is the opposite of this

@novum indeed what if everything you thought you knew about something turned out to be false and instead you were kept through divisive means inside a weird conspiracy matrix - only told what those incharge want you to know - all mushroom like.....

novum wrote:
It's natural that the people on here (and elsewhere) will be angry at how they've been treated, when they were giving of their best (and it was oft used by Icke in "his" writings) and that there will be a venting of that anger - which, while not allowed on the DIFs, is permitted here.

But the DIFs seem to be trying to manipulate the Sanctum's existence for their own purpose - yet ANOTHER dark force that has risen against the True Prophet and must be crushed blah blah blah. And so they try to justify their actions.

It won't work. The Sanctum is gaining a momentum of its own which will go on long after the last Vent has been Vented.

They ought to have learned by now: You can gag some of the people all of the time; all of the people some of the time; but you cannot gag all of the people all of the time.



What's truly astounding is that some people think Icke is "clever". Yet he apparently "owns" a forums where some truly amasing minds work things out for him - but he doesn't stand for them working through the bad bits for him. Doesn't he realise that their "picking faults" is them actually exposing the weak parts of "his theories" and then going on to strengthen them for him?

Silly man.

But it is said that you end up in the company you deserve.

novum wrote:

novum wrote:
Indeed!

I mean, it's utterly ridiculous to expect people to be monogamous to one forum, one channel of information.
What's even more ridiculous is expecting people to report invites without even investigating what the invites are about

andyh wrote:
Whereas for me, andy, it is all to do with Icke himself. All forums attract their fascists and haters - even the soft little spiritual forums I admin'ed had them (and still does, if ever-so gently ).

But when YOUR NAME is so associated with said forums to the extent that... it's the actual title, the clever person would pay attention to what those forums were about.

I'm reminded of the Life Coach and professional blogger, Steve Pavlina. In order to sell his book and teachings, he too set up a forums (I don't know the link, you'd have to google "steve pavlina forums), which was a big forums for its type and brought him lots of attention and sales.

EXCEPT, it went wrong and contained a lot of in-fighting and "experts", which he saw was bad publicity for him. So, big as the forums were, he had sufficient condifence in selling his books/theories/services by other means and closed the forums down. They didn't tally with what he believed and he recognised that many would see his name + the shite going down there = his attitudes.

Icke won't close those forums down, or disassociate with them.

They bring him money. Full stop.