Sanctum Zone

Keyword
A+ A A-
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC: New law 'shuts door' on squatters

Re: New law 'shuts door' on squatters 01 Sep 2012 11:09 #21

  • LesleyPumpshaft
  • LesleyPumpshaft's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • arse biscuits
  • Posts: 2060
  • Thank you received: 1010
  • Karma: 47
A poor per­son hav­ing fun is like kryp­tonite to the rich.

Love it! :chuckle:
You must register to post here.

Re: New law 'shuts door' on squatters 01 Sep 2012 11:42 #22

  • dubs
  • dubs's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Rank0
  • Goodbye and Goodluck
  • Posts: 5408
  • Thank you received: 2474
  • Karma: 69000000
I let my mind go into this a bit last night and a picture emerged. As usual it appears that the way to understand little 'developments' like this is to draw your focus back and look at how it works with other 'developments'.

Abs posted a really great video a while back which showed the story behind the Olympics in East London. The main thrust of which was that 'poor' people are being pushed out of the area around the Olympic park to be replaced by those that work in and around the City of London (which is just a mile or two West of the park).

We've seen Housing benefit caps put in place that are similarly pushing 'poor' people out of the inner city of London. To help sway public opinion on that we've had the MSM giving us stories like the one WUB posted about the "million pound house". Namely stories that give the impression that 'poor' people are living in luxury in the more salubrious parts of London at the tax payers expense. These cases are a tiny minority, a largely insignificant blip when viewed as a part of the overall recipients of Housing Benefit. Stand with your back to the Houses of Parliament and look over the Thames and to the right a bit, what do you see? You see many old Council blocks full of 'poor' people. Things like the HB cap are and will increasingly be, pushing those people out.

Now we have squatting being made criminal. The London Borough of Hackney lies just a bit North of the City of London. It has been full of squats for decades. Off Mare Street for example there are whole streets of squats. Some of these streets are Crown owned and the buildings were declared substandard and left empty as a result. Then they became squatted. Iirc Section 6 of the 1977 Criminal Law act dictates that squatters can only be evicted when the 'landlord' can show the Court that someone has legitimate claim to be in the property. With buildings like that it'd be incredibly hard for the 'landlord' to show that, therefore the squats persist and those wishing to develop (ie flatten the buildings and rebuild) are obstructed. This new development removes that obstruction in one go. Prepare to see these streets and areas of Hackney cleansed of squatters very soon. With the developers going in very soon after. Of course the media is showing us the tiny minority issue of squatters moving in when you, as a mortgaged up home owner, go down the pub....

When you look at these things together what do you see? You see a concerted attempt to cleanse the inner city of London of 'poor' people. You see a co-ordinated set of 'developments' that are all working to that aim. To get rid of any obstructions to the developers building new apartments for the City boys and Gals and to completely change the make up of inner City London.

That's not all of it of course but it's a pretty big part of it I reckon.
Last Edit: 01 Sep 2012 11:45 by dubs.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: diamondgeezer, Abs, Spamfish

Re: New law 'shuts door' on squatters 01 Sep 2012 11:53 #23

  • mikey mikey
  • mikey mikey's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 6518
  • Thank you received: 3378
  • Karma: 23
dubmeup wrote:
When you look at these things together what do you see? You see a concerted attempt to cleanse the inner city of London of 'poor' people. You see a co-ordinated set of 'developments' that are all working to that aim. To get rid of any obstructions to the developers building new apartments for the City boys and Gals and to completely change the make up of inner City London.

Your conclusions can be confirmed with this article.

www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/...on-westminster-bylaw
The proposed bylaw would forbid a person either "to lie down or sleep in or on any public place", or "to distribute any free refreshment", within the confines of a large charitable no-go area west of Victoria station. Offenders could face fines up to £500
So illegal to be homelss or feed the homless. :denied:
Les a handful of exemptions to the "distributing free refreshment" rule are mercifully proposed: these include sporting events (in case the London Marathon needs to be diverted slightly?), and businesses offering free samples of their wares (though only next to their own premises).

But feeding those who are NOT in need. That's okay. :approved:
thank you St Jude for favours granted
You must register to post here.

Re: New law 'shuts door' on squatters 01 Sep 2012 12:25 #24

  • dubs
  • dubs's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Rank0
  • Goodbye and Goodluck
  • Posts: 5408
  • Thank you received: 2474
  • Karma: 69000000
Cheers Mikey, another little 'development' that ties in to the others.
You must register to post here.

Re: New law 'shuts door' on squatters 01 Sep 2012 15:12 #25

  • psketti
  • psketti's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Hired help
  • Rankadmin
  • we cant stop here, this is dog country
  • Posts: 15528
  • Thank you received: 5668
  • Karma: 100
mikey mikey wrote:
This is unbelieveable. They are basically clearing the way forward so that they can condem these people to die quicker to erradicate the problem! WTF seriously?

Reading through the comments, this stood out...

Stupid law easily dealt with by charging a penny for what is usually donated.

Should the person not have a penny, they can borrow it from those distributing.

Does anyone know what law this is and if what this person says is true?
the anorak hides the fact that sean is composed of 95% vaginas
You must register to post here.

Re: New law 'shuts door' on squatters 02 Sep 2012 18:13 #26

  • oioioi
  • oioioi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Zone Facilitator
  • Rankmod
  • with my droogs
  • Posts: 13058
  • Thank you received: 7307
  • Karma: 91
George Osborne has signalled plans for a major deregulation of planning laws, raising the prospect of allowing more development of green belt land.

In an interview on Sunday, the chancellor of the exchequer said he wanted to see more "imaginative" thinking by planning authorities, which could allow building on previously protected land.

His words will anger some ministers and members of the coalition who have campaigned for protected green belts around urban areas to remain free of development.

The announcement of new legislation, which the government hopes will be "fast tracked" into law by October, will also be seen as an acknowledgement that the economy needs a major injection of capital.

In the interview with the BBC's Andrew Marr, Osborne acknowledged the difficulties the country was having in moving out of recession, saying there was no "magical" solution but insisted that despite sustained negative growth, progress was being made.

He refused to say whether he would give up his role as head of the Conservatives' political strategy in the cabinet reshuffle – due to be announced this week – in order to focus on the economy.

Osborne also refused to rule out the option of building a third runway at Heathrow, saying "all options" were being considered. Last week, Downing Street insisted it was sticking to the coalition policy not to add a new runway, despite intense pressure from the business sector and Tory backbenches to reconsider.

Osborne said new planning legislation would be brought before parliament in the next two weeks.

"We will have a specific piece of legislation published next week so that government can use the low interest rates we have earned by being tough on the deficit to underwrite construction projects including housing," he said.

Asked if this would mean developers would be allowed to build on green belt land, Osborne said: "We published our national planning policy framework in March and we are not preparing to tear that up.

"But if you look for example at Cambridge, they have been pretty smart about swapping some bits of the green belt for other bits – in other words allowing some development on the green belt if you bring in new pieces of land into the green belt.

"Those powers already exist but are not widely used. I would like to see more," he said.

Planning policy was thought to be a settled issue after the government backed down on plans to loosen planning rules earlier this year following a campaign by the National Trust.

Councils are drawing up new local development plans to comply with the national planning policy framework (NPPF) by next April.

Under plans being considered by ministers, local authorities may no longer be required to hold a public inquiry if green belt land loses its protected status.

England's green belt covers over 6,000 sq miles of countryside around towns and cities to prevent urban sprawl.

This week's new bill will enable the government to guarantee up to £40bn of private sector investment in infrastructure.

Treasury insiders said they were already involved in talks with 30 companies over the proposed projects, including proposals for the £600m Mersey Gateway project, a six-lane toll bridge between Widnes and Runcorn.

A further announcement, also this week, is expected to set out plans for guaranteeing construction of new homes, with guarantees worth up to £10bn.

This will be followed by an economy bill which will set out further help including more planning reforms.

The legislation will be fast tracked in order to ensure that detailed discussions with commercial parties can take place as soon as possible. It is expected to receive royal assent by the end of October.

Osborne said the low level of bank lending was one of the economy's key weaknesses, and also proposed a "small business bank" to bring together existing schemes to boost lending to small businesses.

The prime minister, David Cameron, is expected to announce new measures to stimulate the housing market on Thursday.

Osborne's plans are likely to be bitterly fought inside the cabinet, with senior Liberal Democrats and the communities secretary, Eric Pickles – who negotiated the peace deal over the national planning policy framework – reportedly opposed to further changes.

The chancellor declined to say whether the announcement was an acknowledgement that the government's economic strategy was not working. "They are difficult times for the British economy, difficult times for the world, but our economy is healing, jobs are being created. It is taking time but there is no easy route to a magical recovery," he said.

"This country faces a big question about this country's future role in the world. I am determined that we will be in the right place at the right time to ensure that we are one of the western economies that thrives in this new world," he said.

Osborne also refused to say whether he would give up his role as the Tories' senior political strategist – despite demands from backbenchers that he concentrate on the economy.

The Tory MP for Northampton South, Brian Binley, called this weekend for Osborne to stand down from his job to concentrate on winning the next election.

"I am 110% focused on the economy – any changes to the cabinet will be announced by the prime minister," Osborne said.

Cameron has signalled the start of his political fightback by vowing to "cut through the dither" that he says is holding Britain back.

As MPs prepare to return to Westminster on Monday following the summer break, the prime minister promised a series of high-profile initiatives to get the country moving again and breathe new life into the flagging economy.

His comments will be seen as a riposte to discontented Tory MPs who have attacked his leadership during the recess, with one senior backbencher suggesting he was a political "mouse".

Writing in the Mail on Sunday, Cameron made clear he was ready to take on his critics – bringing forward controversial measures to boost growth by relaxing planning rules.

He said the country could not afford the "paralysis" that caused new housing developments to be held up by entrenched local opposition and lengthy planning inquiries.

"A familiar cry goes up: 'Yes we want more housing, but no to every development – and not in my back yard.' The nations we're competing against don't stand for this kind of paralysis and neither must we," he wrote.

"Frankly, I am frustrated by the hoops you have to jump through to get anything done – and I come back to parliament more determined than ever to cut through the dither that holds this country back."

Meanwhile, the Tory rightwinger David Davis said the government must draw up a new, alternative pro-growth strategy to get the economy moving.

In an interview with the Sunday Telegraph, Cameron's former rival for the party leadership said a further round of spending cuts before the general election in 2015 was "inevitable".

"The coalition's cuts should have been earlier and deeper," he said. "This is not about individual policy areas. This is about something more fundamental … something deeper. There is an alternative economic policy."

Labour said the government's new proposals to stimulate growth showed a lack of ideas.

Chris Leslie, the shadow financial secretary to the Treasury, said the chancellor was desperate to cling on to his failing plan, regardless of the long-term damage the IMF had warned it risked doing to the economy.

"We will look closely at the details of any further changes to the planning system, including what happens to protections for the green belt. But this will not address the real reasons why construction has contracted in the last year, such as slashed public investment in housing and the lack of confidence and demand in the economy.

"What we need is a change of course and real action now to boost jobs and growth, including genuinely bringing forward infrastructure projects, a temporary cut in VAT and tax breaks for small firms taking on extra workers."
www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/sep/02/...lation-planning-laws
If you have any issues with the forum or it's members, for a speedier response, rather than pressing the report button, please post them here: sanctumzone.co.uk/forum/Forum-Projects--...scussion-thread.html
You must register to post here.

Re: New law 'shuts door' on squatters 03 Sep 2012 15:27 #27

  • oioioi
  • oioioi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Zone Facilitator
  • Rankmod
  • with my droogs
  • Posts: 13058
  • Thank you received: 7307
  • Karma: 91
And so it begins...

www.theargus.co.uk/news/9907467.Squat_ra...ghton_s_London_Road/
Police raid squat in Brighton's London Road.
Two squatters in roof standoff as crowds gather in support.
Raid is believed to be the UK's first under new legislation criminalising squatting in residential buildings.

Live updates on the link
If you have any issues with the forum or it's members, for a speedier response, rather than pressing the report button, please post them here: sanctumzone.co.uk/forum/Forum-Projects--...scussion-thread.html
Last Edit: 03 Sep 2012 15:27 by oioioi.
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: psketti, dubs

Re: New law 'shuts door' on squatters 03 Sep 2012 16:11 #28

  • oioioi
  • oioioi's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Zone Facilitator
  • Rankmod
  • with my droogs
  • Posts: 13058
  • Thank you received: 7307
  • Karma: 91

3:56pm

Hove MP Mike Weatherley has issued a press release about the raid, which he describes as the UK's first.

He said: “I’m fully behind Sussex Police taking this swift action to enforce these new powers. Squatters knew that their anti-social actions would face consequences from 1st September, so it is welcome news the new law is being enforced.

"I have been campaigning since my election to Parliament to have squatting criminalised, so it is encouraging to see justice finally served.”

I wonder if he has a second home :roll:
If you have any issues with the forum or it's members, for a speedier response, rather than pressing the report button, please post them here: sanctumzone.co.uk/forum/Forum-Projects--...scussion-thread.html
You must register to post here.

Re: New law 'shuts door' on squatters 03 Sep 2012 17:48 #29

  • mikey mikey
  • mikey mikey's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 6518
  • Thank you received: 3378
  • Karma: 23
oioioi wrote:
Hove MP Mike Weatherley has issued a press release about the raid, which he describes as the UK's first.
I wonder if he has a second home :roll:

Well it was Weatherly who was the driving force behind bringing about the change in the law
Mr Weatherley has been campaigning for squatting to be criminalised since his election to Parliament in 2010.

www.brightonandhovenews.org/2012/08/31/h...iminal-offence/17064

but here is a bit of a turn up....
his wife of seven years was exposed as a £70-an-hour prostitute.
Mike Weatherley, 53, was one of the new wave of MPs who came to power with Prime Minister David Cameron earlier this year.

The father-of-three took his blonde wife to functions in the run-up to the General Election, and just two months ago she was photographed visiting the Houses of Parliament.

But it was revealed by a Sunday newspaper that 39-year-old Carla has also been busy plying her trade in three different 'massage parlours', under the names Bea, Adriana and Bianca.

Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1309280...e.html#ixzz25QT18p30
The couple are understood to have met in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, while business executive Mr Weatherley was on a work trip.

They married in Brighton in 2003. It was the MP's second marriage and, at the time, the new Mrs Weatherley's occupation was listed as 'housewife'.


Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1309280...e.html#ixzz25QTomi6J
thank you St Jude for favours granted
Last Edit: 03 Sep 2012 18:18 by mikey mikey.
You must register to post here.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Moderators: psketti, oioioi, batou
Time to create page: 0.145 seconds

Latest Members Blogs

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

What is going on when it comes to 9-11 I…

The EPA (environmental protection agency) and OSHA took air samples in the days following September 11th, they reported that they found no excessive levels of asbestos contrary to other findings....

Read more

9-11 Eleven Years Later

9-11 Eleven Years Later

With the anniversary of September 11th literally just around the corner, unanswered questions still remain for families who lost loved ones during the tragic event, as well as from families...

Read more

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass An…

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass Animal Deaths

In 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a series of lower court rulings that restrict the United States Navy's use of sonar in submarine detection training exercises off...

Read more

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 250 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 192 - Raised
( £ 140 GBP )
donation thermometer
56%
Most Recent Donation:
$122 USD on 4th Jan 2021
Bitcoin Address: bc1q0kazqya0nurfxtunxv807vm0m8852nnrrk8mj8
 
Ethereum Address: 0xe69915c80dd75df19f438d556267e04f932f057d
 
More Info: Donation options for TZ

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.

TradeZone Latest

Visitors

Today18
Yesterday1029
Week2524
Month1047
Total1163050

Your IP Address: 216.73.216.242 Your Browser and OS: Unknown - Unknown Wednesday, 02 September 2026 00:44

Who Is Online

Guests : 570 guests online Members : No members online
© 2012 – 2021 Sanctum Zone | All rights reserved. This website is a place for people to express and discuss their views on the news and world events. DISCLAIMER: Please Note: Views expressed and submitted by contributors are their own personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions and beliefs of the Sanctum Zone website and its founder(s) , administrators , moderators , and any other website maintenance technicians, personnel and volunteers. Articles and messages posted on this website and forum are solely the opinion of their authors.

Login or Register

LOG IN

Register

User Registration
or Cancel