Ab Origine wrote:
Thanks wub.
Nature of call centres really though, innit? I worked in a similar housing call centre where the ethos was much the same. So much so, that temp staff were eventually brought in with little or no training, just to field calls.
Irony is however, the lack of training and eagerness to get people off the phones and meet KPIs, meant people invariably had to call back to chase up stuff that never got done right in the first place.
I did try and explain this to management but they weren't very keen on listening.
Actual, physical job centres are on the way out too, especially with these new '
training providers'.
Apparently, a new system is now being rolled out across the country whereby you no longer get your allotted four mins with an actual job centre advisor when you go to sign-on. Instead, you submit your work 'diary' at reception, who issue a new one for the next two weeks. If this diary is not completed to somebody, somewhere's satisfaction, your money will be stopped until any issues can be ironed out.
Woe betide you if you have any issues with the provider, also. I did and tried to complain, but was told to do so via the provider?!
Bye, bye Job Centre.

For my sins in a previous life, I worked in a Jobcentre 'contact' centre for six months.
I had this conversation several times:
- It's not really a 'contact' centre, is it? It's a call centre.
- No, it's a contact centre.
- How do you contact the 'contact' centre?
- By telephone.
- Can you contact the 'contact' centre any other way?
- Not really.
- How does this differ from a call centre?
* Manager walks off *
While I greatly sympathise with you having to work in a call centre, Abs, I suppose you could make the distinction that the Jobcentre 'contact' centre is supposed to be helping people, quite often pretty poor people at that. Not that companies should treat their staff / customers like shit, but it seems pretty repulsive for a public service to be run in this way.