diamondgeezer wrote:
It seems you and frog either have a severe case of short term memory loss or you didn't read the vote poll thread

The subjects hardly legit if its coming from people who left DIF years ago is it?
Its also not legit if its taking screenies of someone elses posts on this forum and putting it on DIF is it?

andyh wrote:
The subjects of David Icke, his forum, or the people running his forum, are legitimate ones for discussion.

Irrespective of whether the person/s discussing it have just arrived from the DIF, left there years ago, or indeed have never been there in the first place.

People want to discuss it. They have a legitimate right to do so on this forum, which is a freedom of speech forum.

Simple as that. Whats so hard to grasp?

I cant concentrate on this stupid thread. IAAIA is only here to be a nuicence. spelt wrong. He aint here to be nice.

His whole forum is to dis Dif, and now here..

This forum is supposed to be a Sanctum... where people can talk nicely to each other. Not be mean.
Nobody should have to put up with anyone who deliberately comes on here to be nasty.

my 2 cents. xxx luv you guys and gals on here who are nice and friendly

wtf am i supposed to say? all i want is a lovely forum..

diamondgeezer wrote: Discussion yes.
Venting is not discussion, nor is trying to get us in trouble is it?
DELIBERATELY I might add....
I'm not that much of a dumb fuck that I hold a grudge after 3 months let alone 3 years..
No, its not a free speech forum, I can prove that in seconds

Have you seen ftil's carry on? Do I have to link it for you?

andyh wrote:
Nope no short term memory loss. I read it didn't vote in it and haven't been back to it. Want to know why because I'm not interested in it and I exercised my rights to ignore shit I'm not interested in.

The terms and the guide lines make it quite clear that members here can talk about anything provided they stay on point, don't promote violence or illegal activity. It also says that bullying and abusive behavior is not acceptable.

Your poll would suggest that there are a number of members who shouldn't be posting on threads relating to DIF matters because they are sick of them. Surely reading them and then posting on them indicates hypocrisy or harassment perhaps even a combination of the two. Just a thought.

Frog wrote:
Then we do not have a free speech forum.
And as such newcomers cannot expect it.

andyh wrote:
Maybe you should open a thread on that issue and stop spamming this one.

andyh wrote:
Go head, I'm all ears.

It seems to me that what you are asking is for a restriction of free speech, to be perfectly honest. No offence.

diamondgeezer wrote:
Then I'm OK to call you a blind fucking wanker who has completely ignored what ftil has been all about and start several threads about useless doley cunts and fucking stinking paki's and perhaps link to goatse.cx pics in 20 separate threads, pm everyone the goatse.cx images too, invite KOTG over here and generally have a ball?

andyh wrote:
Do you seriously need that explained to you? Abusive behavior isn't acceptable period! Having a pop and ignoring the issues raised in the debate isn't acceptable. It's normally a pretty good indicate that the person has no strong argument or case to present.

Self moderation and personal responsibility are high on the list of core values here that is made clear in the community guide.

As for other members posting things which are a problem no one has reported anything today.

The last three pages or so of this thread need to be split from here do you have a suggestion for the title of the new thread as it is effectively your content?

andyh wrote:
See, now thats a proper post if ever I saw one. I thougt you were better than that Andy.

What do you want us to do, have no rules in place at all?

How about if we just allow the racists & nazis to come over and say what the fuck they liked? Who'd be the first person to complain if we did that? YOU would be, thats who.

Get a grip & grow up man.

FUCK!

time out guys!

maybe a wee break and a cuppa, smoke, beer etc eh!

diamondgeezer wrote:
Ofc we have rules, that was what the bloody vote was for wasn't it?
It was to show community feeling about a topic THAT IS ALL. IT WAS NOT TO GAG PEOPLE.
It was to demonstrate to ftil that his offhand comment about it being 'just a few' was completely wrong, I did link that thread where he made that comment and I did explain it in great detail on that thread.

The community rules here are about people taking control of themselves and what they type, obviously though thats not going to work with some ppl is it?
Although I notice today ftil has decided to post in a different thread (stand back in amazement).

Its not ME who wants us to have no rules in place at all is it *groan*...for chrissake...

andyh wrote:
Didn't you just try and use the rules that are in place to try and justify your assertion that this isn't a free speech forum? Yes, you did.

FAIL...

Any chance of a fucking time out here!

Aye, wtf chaps?

diamondgeezer wrote:
Yes I did and I succeeded! Pissed you off didn't it? lol.
ftil keeps on insinuating that this is a free speech forum and the matter is not just about DIF...it is about what the community decides is a 'relevant and constructive topic', obviously abusive comments are not, even if the ones its aimed at aren't on this forum.

This is definitely not a free speech forum, its a fair speech forum. There's a massive difference.

andyh wrote:
Yes it did piss me off somewhat because you're all over the place here, going on tangents left right & centre. lol

You think we aren't onto whats going on around here ffs ftil...why the fuck do you think her status is set as 'spammer'?

Anyway, no hard feelings andy Carry on everyone...I'm off to the pub shortly.

diamondgeezer wrote:
It seems you have got what I was trying to get across now and deffo no hard feelings
IAAIA did also get the message earlier in this thread and has been a very positive contributor.

I have no intention of gagging anyone about anything with the vote, it was to demonstrate a point is all!

You may if you wish post about DIF to your hearts content providing it abides by our guidelines, just don't expect many replies!

G'day Curtaincat.
curtaincat wrote:
Perhaps it would be beneficial for you not to read "this stupid thread" then ... your choice.
curtaincat wrote:
And you've come to the conclusion that I am "only here to become a nuicence" based upon what ?

You claim I "aint here to be nice" based upon what ?

I find it interesting that you claim to know my intent and purpose for being on this forum, especially as I have stated the reason already and it isn't what you are claiming. Are you inferring that I have lied about my intent in being here ?

Is such an inference without supportive evidence what you consider being "nice" ?
curtaincat wrote:
By stating "His whole forum", you are using an absolute. Here's a link to "My Threads", a thread in my 'Your Space' section of the IL forum where I keep links for all of the threads that I have started ...

www.infinite-love-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=185

... perhaps you could point out how my threads are "to dis Dif", without even having to show how the "whole forum is to dis Dif".

Further, it would be interesting to see if you could show how I am doing so "here" from the posts that I have currently made.
curtaincat wrote:
And by inference, once again, you make out as if I don't "talk nicely", am "mean" and have "deliberately comes here to be nasty". Any supportive evidence of this ?

Or are you simply not talking "nicely" about me, being "mean" in reference to me and deliberately being "nasty" to me ?
curtaincat wrote:
Again by inference you make out as if I am not "nice and friendly"
curtaincat wrote:
Whatever you choose "to say", after all, it's your self-expression and you are the one in control of it, no one else is.

To have "a lovely forum", you create it. Do you think this post you have made is a way in which to express yourself to create "a lovely forum" ?