Gilly wrote:
Dogsmilk, I listened to a dietician giving a talk some time ago, and having devoted much time to study, he was convinced that a great deal of what we're led to believe about how good different foodstuffs are and are not for our well-being is complete BS. One thing he was adamant about though was that we're meant to eat meat.
Sure. And I'm sure you can find other dieticians that say they're wrong. Some dietician might evangelise about the Atkins diet or something, others might say it's unhealthy. What 'a dietician' says is neither here nor there.
It also depends on what kind of dietician they are - you get all this fringe stuff that says all kinds. I remember reading some copy of Nexus once where somebody with alleged credentials was saying garlic is evil and should be avoided. No matter what the food, someone somewhere will claim it's wrong. But the general medical consensus is that you do not need to eat animal products to be healthy. It is simply common sense that if your diet contains all the nutrients the human body requires you have nothing to worry about.
When my sister became a vegetarian in the 80s she was warned by her GP she'd become ill. It was bollocks.
I've been a vegetarian for 20 years and a vegan for about 12. About the same timescale for Mrs Dogsmilk. And I have noticed no difference whatsoever in my health from eating meat, being vegetarian and being vegan. Despite years of added hedonistic self abuse. I do notice a difference according to whether I eat loads of crap and the exercise I'm getting. It's just common sense.
It's all common sense that if you look around, veggies and vegans are just the same as everybody else. People take strong stances on one being healthier to the other, but as far as I'm concerned I'm not interested in arguing that veganism is healthier - I don't actually care either way. The fact is vegans (and veggies) do absolutely fine and
even if there was some kind of health issue, it's obviously very, very minor as the evidence vegans/veggies are routinely unhealthy is non-existent. You can find plenty of perfectly healthy vegans out there - assuming they don't do other unhealthy things. Any health problems I may develop will most likely be because of the amount of drugs (and whatever the fuck they've been cut with) I've taken and cigarettes I've smoked over the years. Another lifestyle choice, same as what I choose to eat. And other factors like stress, pollution, chemicals in the food chain etc - my diet is the least of my health concerns unless I'm living on crisps (which I could easily do. I fucking love crisps).
However, I'd certainly agree we evolved to eat meat - I reckon a very small amount similar to our closest relatives who do eat meat but it constitutes a miniscule amount of their diet. So what?
I think the entire health argument is a smokescreen to obscure what is in essence a moral argument. The glaring fact vegans/veggies who eat sensibly do just fine and so do meat eaters who eat sensibly renders the entire issue an academic exercise in percentages of risk factors you can debate forever that are complicated by a huge array of other lifestyle and environmental factors. I wouldn't eat the still warm brains of human infants even if it was revealed as 100% certain they were healthy and we evolved to eat them. I don't need to and it's obvious why I wouldn't want to. Some hypothetical, marginal health benefit would be irrelevant. Anyone who tells me I'm 'meant' to eat meat needs to explain why I've done just fine without it for the last 20 years.
There's one thing that is certainly alarming about being vegan - you end up routinely checking the ingredients of every goddam thing in the supermarket. And boy does it grind home how much unnecessary crap is in our food beyond all the hidden horses.