simulacra wrote:
Completely out of your depth aren't you?

Are you gonna fuck off now and leave discussion to the adults?

That World Trade Center buildings 1, 2, and 7 were brought down by a combination of plasmoid gas and infrared beams is a theory first reported in early 2002 by 9/11 researcher/writer Christopher Bollyn an article for the website American Free Press. Others have followed his lead, at least on the laser-beam portion of directed-energy weapons pulverizing those 110-story skyscrapers.(1)

Basically, this theory posits that two infrared beams—each placed to meet in one spot targeted by an invisible cloud of plasmoid gas—were in position to destroy the buildings the moment aircraft struck it. The cloud was directly in front of the aircraft leading them. In less than an hour two-thirds of each tower disintegrated into curb-high dust throughout Lower Manhattan—concrete, steel, combustibles and people. WTC 7, not hit by aircraft, collapsed in 6.5 seconds on its footprint.(2)

The evidence rests heavily on an unnamed German physicist who had been a researcher with the Soviet counterpart to the CIA. Interviewed by Agence France-Presse, he reported a demonstration in Weimar of Soviet Union experiments in 1991 with beams that could transform small solid objects to dust. The Soviets staged the experiment benefit of the U.S. Air Force Electronic Security Command officials to indicate how they could bring down missiles and Stealth bombers. They bolstered such claims by saying that in 1969 they had destroyed a wall with this technology where the Ussuri River divides China from their country.(3)................. norfidid.wordpress.com/part-3-of-4-did-p...the-wtc-destruction/

Strange just one of this group privy to the demonstration (no footage or photographs?) has decided to speak about it?does this unnamed physicist even exist, do Directed energy weapons even exist? Do they need to for DEW to be effectively weaponized?

Gilly wrote:
THE MODS and other certain posters probably get a bonus if they can suppress dr judy wood's work on the forum..ive seen them target discussions to get it off track..they work 24/7..they probably work shift patterns..do you want me to name a few?

simulacra wrote:
Oh FFS could you be any more asleep? You've already been shown that DEW's are being used regularly let alone exist.

Right and you've been told that crowd control weapons that slightly irritate people's skin couldn't bring down a building.

The only evidence such a weapon could be used to vapourize anything is from an "unnamed German physicist from the KGB", and you think I'm the one who is sleepwalking?

simulacra wrote:
No.

You've been shown that the principals behind ADS crowd control systems can indeed be used to obliterate concrete and steel. You have in no way offered any evidence to the contrary so what are you talking about? Did you understand what I said when I was talking about resonant frequency? Be honest.

again this couldn't blow up a building, let along vaporize it:

SilvaRizla wrote: In this quote?
It's the length you have to go to justify an irrationally held irrational belief, to "prove" what you "think" is true.

Theoretically that may be true, regardless of that it has nothing to do with Islamic fundamentalists flying planes into buildings on September 11th in line with Osama Bin Laden's call for Islamists to unite and wage resistance against America, Israel and the civilized world in general.

coates wrote:
Listen, the mods don't get paid at all, never mind get bonuses.

simulacra wrote:
Do you even know how to hold a conversation?

I was responding to your idea that such weaponry would kill the survivors found in the stairwell. My point has been proven conclusively in my response. I've stated that you should check the FACTS I have given you if you don't believe me. It was a direct response to a comment you made. Not me trying to back up an 'irrational belief' that happens to be supported by plenty of scientific data, unlike the official explanation.

Your islamic fundamentalist theory has more holes than a colander. Its a proven lie. Yet you hang on to it, why?

You do know that the only video Bin Laden released at the time said something along the lines of: "I had nothing to do with 9/11, there is a government within your government that is responsible".?

The Director of Public Affairs at the Directed Energy Directorate, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico says Dr Judy Wood's 9/11 directed energy weapon evidence is "interesting and worthy of further consideration".


MESSAGE: I received your fax yesterday and your FedEx package today, and had a chance to review the materials you sent. During our telephone conversation I outlined a variety of directed energies that might have future weapons applications but I'm not aware of any that are mature enough to cause the damage at the World Trade Center. Lasers are the most likely candidates for nearer-term weapons use and, to that enc, we have conducted laboratory tests to evaluate the effects of laser energy on different materials. For the most part, those materials have been metals, not concrete structures. Effects on metals are from the heat generated by an intense beam of coherent light, which cause the metals to weaken and split. Given sufficient heat, metals would melt (become liquids) and, given significantly more heat, could turn to gases. Since we haven't tested concrete I don't know if the effect would be dust. You report phenomena that we cannot explain here, either because we don't have enough data or because the phenomena are not within our area of expertise. While on a personal level I may find Dr Wood's investigation interesting and worthy of further consideration, on a professional level we are unable to devote our limited resources to activities outside of our charter, I wish you success in your endeavor and am available to answer whatever directed energy questions may arise.



Respectfully,



JUVEISTTINO R GARCÍA
Director of Public Affairs
Directed Energy Directorate
Air Force Research Laboratory
Kirtland AFB, NM 87117-6776

See original fax copy here. drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Garcia_letter.html

Gilly wrote:

Aye... good idea.

simulacra wrote:
Just a thought, but if stuff like this does exist, it will be highly militarised & classified.
They're hardly likely to be dishing it out in Poundland.

By popular request... I've changed the thread title coates as this has fuck all to do with Icke mods.

psketti wrote:
But they are scaredy cats though?

psketti wrote:
What about a poll?

Questions, questions....

Blue_Tackler wrote:
Cough!

Space Bandit wrote: I don't think so I think it would be in use for purposes of national security, did you watch the video I posted above?
That's what the military are using now.