humanspirit wrote:
I was curious to what your opinion is of bookmakers in general.
Do you think they should exist as an industry?
What is the anarchists point of view?
They are no use to society and leech off peoples desperation IMHO.
If they wouldn't have existed in the first place i wouldn't be wasting my money on the spongers.
I'm a libertarian, so I'm in favour of everything being legalised and decriminalised. All drugs, prostitution, everything. I would allow cigarette advertising the way that it used to be. But firstly all companies that want to engage in these things should have to be honest and open about the genuine risks. Not say "we support reponsible gambling". Actually openly tell people what the odds are very clearly so that they can make an informed decision. Same with alcohol, cigarettes, fast food, drugs, both prescription and recreational, etc. I watch loads of sport, and it's betting advert, beer advert, betting advert, beer advert...and at no stage is the danger of these things made remotely clear.
Secondly, instead of spending millions and billions of pounds running around trying to arrest people and crack down on drug dealers, when 'somehow' the drugs keep getting into the company anyway, aggressively enforcing debt and tax collection, and running highly dubious policies that allow Tesco, GM foods, oil companies and other multinational corporations to take over (even more) all of the money could be invested in counselling, support services, etc. Not just for alcoholism, drug dependence, addiction to gambling, etc, but other social progammes as well. There is absolutely no need for society and the economy to be run the way that it is and it could change quite easily if people demand it.
But I think adults should always be able to choose things like eating unhealthy food, drinking, taking drugs, paying for sex and any other consensual acts which the state might outlaw for some reason or other, but they should be able to make an informed decision and receive proper support if they become an addict rather than condemnation and possible criminal prosecution.