Mike wrote:
.......... wrote:
andyh wrote:
If you actually wanted 'change' then you'd have voted libertarian.
Andy i already told you and WUB that i would have voted for Ralph Nader if that had been an option.
I actually think America needs a widescale social revolution, if any of the third parties start doing well stealing democrat votes, you could well end up with a dodgy Republican like Mitt Romney or Sarah Palin making president, Nader despite his good intentions could easily cause one of those paleo christards to get elected, the alternative to that or a dramatic change in the structure of politics in the U$A is to keep voting Dems i guess?
I couldn't imagine Mitt being taken half as seriously on the global platform as Obama, I think despite the continuing War on Terror and Terrorist detainments ongoing in Gitmo he's done a lot to restore America's global image, especially with the UN and the Mid East.
If i have to get back into this debate with Andy & WUB again i'm going to try and be more mature this time around.
I feel like Mike thinks from a practical perspective that the next generation can relate to more than others here.
Me and WUB kinda got into a little argument awhile back over this and the thread got locked and vented.
I personally believe that in 2000 voting for Nader instead of voting for Gore left us stuck with Bush and the Iraq war.
Now considering that a million people died in Iraq over some people making bad decisions at the voting booth is troubling.
Not Andy, WUB or anyone else can convince me that Bush & Cheney and the PNAC did not have that agenda.
Bush senior started that war and Bush Jr came along and finished it , simple as that.
Having a father and son both be president with one person only in between them is Monarchish.
I honestly just don't believe that Al Gore would have ordered the Shock & Awe of Iraq.
Which leads me to believe that not voting against Republicans is damaging to world health.
So even though i respect George Carlin, the idea of not voting is dangerous sometimes.
Do you want to know what thinking practical is? Its called voting libertarian, its called rejecting lies and taking responsibility for yourself.
Its called stopping expecting someone else to provide the answers for you. Because they WON'T, not EVER.
Obama has the SAME agenda as Bush, if you can't see it you are blinded by PR which is its intended purpose.