andyh wrote:
I see ES and David Duke as both being stupid assholes.
Sorry DM.
Like I said before, intelligence would acknowledge the power of co-operation not separation.
It would also acknowledge some aspects of reality like you know...falling fertility rates as evidenced and recorded by scientists the world over. Ofc all this is completely ignored by mainstream culture which refuses to look at it.
To address it would be to change its outlook which would be the intelligent scientific thing to do

I of course agree with the assholes part. But I'd maintain Duke is intelligent.
Look, you're equating intelligence with what you consider to be rational and sensible. I'm saying intelligence is a broad church.
So a conman is intelligent if he figures out a clever way of getting you to hand over your cash
David Duke is intelligent if he concocts pseudo-intellectual arguments as to why Jews are this or black people are that some people will be beguiled by - he knows what he's doing.
Advertising execs are intelligent if they figure out a new way of convincing you you need whatever bullshit
Your average Joe is intelligent when he spends hours working out how to mod whatever computer game or having an encyclopaedic knowledge of his football team.
You can't equate intelligence with people thinking the sort of things you thing they should. Really, what you're trying to suggest about average Joe is ignorance, which is different. Or even willful ignorance.
You may say that's semantics but I think it's important - because I don't think it's a good thing to write off billions of people because they don't share your personal priorities.
I'll ignore the rest of it cos its too epic and/or because you agree with much of it anyway.
I'll simply point out what I explained earlier about intelligence, if you disagree then thats fine.
I don't expect everyone to have the same definition for the word.
I see intelligence as being tied in with questioning and the entire cognitive process, you don't big deal tbh.
/shrugs.