angelchemuel wrote:
Just found this link...
www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/03/19/294355/...pes-economic-stance/
It wont allow me to copy/paste/quote unfortunately.
It is a MUST read....especially the bit of the Jesuits link to Russia and their seeming growing interest in China...the article has got me thinking outside the 'msm box' and has joined a lot of dots,
even down to the possibility of why Queenie and Cameron didn't attend the Popes innauguration. It will throw an insight to what is going on 'behind the scenes' in Cyprus although not mentioning it specifically.

Jane
I didn't know that, but I think your conclusion makes perfect sense.
It's totally true, in my opinion, that one possible intention of this could have been to cause a bank run. But here is how I feel about it. What are the chances of a bank run in the UK, when no-one is paying attention to the news? Let alone understand the real consequences of it. This thread has instantly become one of the biggest ever in the news section because we all understand the potential consequences of this, not to mention the precedent that is being set. Most people don't.
And it's important to emphasise that it is unprecedented. I'm sure you would get someone that knows a shedload about economic history that could give you some example of when something similar had happened in the past. But in terms of the modern financial system and the IMF being involved, they've never imposed these sort of punitive measures before. In Argentina, they froze everyone's bank account and limited the amount that could be taken out for months. When I used to write about that, I always considered that to be an extreme measure, and there were extreme consequences. There were tanks on the street, months of rioting and looting, soup kitchens all over the place, banks were absolutely smashed up, tear gas fired at the public, etc. But even then there was no proposal to rob anyone's savings. In this case, they're still seriously talking about taking 15%, and the IMF went into the meeting proposing 40%, and Christine Lagarde has confirmed that she approved this. And I think it's important to note that they came up with all this money laundering bullshit later on, but the primary justification for this is stated here:
www.forbes.com/sites/abrambrown/2013/03/...an-financial-crisis/
And here’s the larger picture. Cyprus is badly indebted. Its debt-to-GDP ratio pushed to 127% in the third quarter of 2012, the latest period tabulated by European Union officials. Such high debt reflects Cyprus’ ill financial health. Only Greece (at 153%) has a higher level. The bailout would begin to reduce its debt, sending it back below 100% of GDP within the year.
And now they're saying, "oh, don't worry, though, no-one else's deposits are under threat". Which is exactly what the Cypriots were told 24 hours before their bank accounts were frozen. Which they still are. But the reality is that no such guarantees can be made. They can sit there all day long saying "Cyprus is a unique case", but every other European nation is in a similar position. That's why they all went to the IMF in the first place. They can't offer any such guarantees with any credibility because they've already claimed that adding more debt to create growth, re-packaging the debt, printing more money, creating greater integration, having budgets managed by the EU commission, etc, will solve the problem. Now they're claiming that they need to rob savings in order to reduce the level of debt of one nation, but that it's an isolated case. It's complete bullshit. Certainly there are strong indications that they're going to go after Italy next.
So there is no bank in Europe that can guarantee that they won't freeze your account. They can say that they won't, but they can't guarantee it because (a) this is precisely what was promised to the Cypriots, and (b) you can absolutely bet your bottom dollar that very similar economic conditions to Cyprus exist within the nation that the bank is located, wherever it may be. Also, not every nation is going to have a load of natural gas that they can sell off to find an escape route out of the situation, which could yet be the road Cyprus goes down. If Britain was in Cyprus' situation, they would either have to default, rapidly devalue the pound, or completely go along with the IMF.
So I think under these circumstances it is at least wise to give yourself something to fall back on.