Gilly wrote:
Thor, I have warm feelings towards you, for your kindness and intelligence.
But here's the flaw in your strategy, the way I see it - i.e. when the trouble-makers are around, you just don't post, till they've got themselves banned.
We could all stop posting while a troll has some fun, and prior to them pushing hard enough to get banned, what happens to the forum? We've been discouraged from using the place because of the bullies. So they've got their way anyway, albeit temporarily. Until the next sock pops in.
I am not suggesting stopping posting altogether but having 'post blindness' when it comes to those deliberately on a wind up - if no one responds what can they do? either stop posting or start being so outrageous that they end up breaking a rule or can be temp banned for spamming.
It is not easy not to rise to the idiotic things some people say - someone who manages to respond to provocation in a way that makes me both grin and stand in awe is abs - not all of us can pull it off though - I know I can't as my sense of humour is somewhat bypassed half the time - but it is an option to try instead of constant attacks and name calling etc.
And again to reiterate I don't expect people to change just cos I don't like something but I did want to get this off me chest.
Yeah don't bother posting. Just let Mike diss everything , don't bother to show him up as being a twat and don't ban him.
Ffs Thor , make a new forum for him and let him rant on it about Marxism on one hand and how he loves the libdems on the other