batou wrote:
he/she is obviously a twat, maybe even a just here for trolling, so while I completely understand the banning - it still doesn't sit well with me, but thats probably due to experiences on that other forum.

Yes he was a dick. He waves away things saying its false or whatever. Maybe I was wrong I just got tired of the same old shit stirring.

I'm sorry guys. Look I'll unban him. Overstepped my boundaries I guess.

There you go heres your fucker back.

thoreau wrote:
It was deliberate Thor, nobody is THAT stupid.

That's what I thought too. But you know, if it's giving people a bad feeling then whatever. It gives me a bad feeling to have him here I'm just a selfless kinda guy.

batou wrote:
Theres no consistency to it whatsoever, co-op banks are OK but taking it any further is not. Mondragon is not anarcho-syndicalism but a hippy commune and you can pay tax credits using 49bn corp tax but then not corp tax but just 'tax'...and on and on.
Obvious as fuck, a bit like Zara_T as well.

As for this thread he may as well have said Russia and China are free along with dozens of other countries I could care to mention.
As for Switzerland he's already argued against wanting direct democracy with Mondragon, again glaring inconsistency and WUM.

Theres a difference between having a diff pov and just being a complete cock for the sakes of it.

Am in full agreement that barny aint covered themselves in glory in this thread.
It certainly does look like wumming.
But.
We have all given it fuel and a ban seems ott so i am glad it's benn lifted.

Right, I figure Zara is another on the chopping block. I'm not trying to be a tyrant, just want to protect the sanctity of the sanctum.

andyh wrote:
Thats somewhat patronising tbh holding a contrary view to others does not stupid make . I don't think I am all I am is stupid but he seems to advocate the birth certificate stuff that I personally think is a pile of bollocks - besides being 'stupid' is not a ban worthy offense surely

@bats thankyou for unbanning

batou wrote:
IAAIA is genuine, there's a big difference there.
I don't go for the birth cert stuff either, that said, he doesn't deliberately talk shit for the sakes of it.

I'd re-ban and put it to forum vote later, don't just ban and lift a ban if 2 ppl tell you to Bats. You did the right thing IMHO and possibly others too.

It's not only this thread Barnfish has been playing silly buggers on you know.

So barn fish is in limbo and you get to decide his fate.

That's my final decision.
You guys are so difficult.. But I like you.

batou wrote:
I didnt mean to sound like I was complaining in earlier post, have no complaints about your decision at all, the poster is a shit stirrer no doubt. experiences on the other forum have just made me a bit wary of banning members. But at the end of the day, someone has to make decisions like this and, although you obviously dont want to be like the other forum, some people will ultimately need banning I suppose. I'm glad its not up to me:-)

batou wrote:
Listen Bats, back in the day there was non of this liberal, lets see the consensus shit, get the old black uniform out of the cupboard with the SS runes, jack boots on, put them against the wall and with no blindfold

The good old days... I thought all I had to do was pull a trigger I didn't realize it came with all this paperwork.

diforumreject wrote:
Yes it is... that's why this forum can never be like the forum that must not be named.

Oioioi weren't you gonna name this Forum , SANCTUM ZONE, the Forum that Must not be named ?

Catchy name...