https://www.globalresearch.ca/deleted-daily-mail-online-article-us-backed-plan-for-chemical-weapon-attack-in-syria-to-be-blamed-on-assad/5339178

"In January 29, 2013, Britain’s most popular Daily Newspaper, in its online version Dailymail.co.uk published an article titled:

U.S. ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad’s regime’

A few days later they pulled the article.

What the reason was for the deletion remains unclear. The article was published at this URL:

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S...ria-blame-Assad.html

There exists a cached version of the article which can be found here:

web.archive.org/web/20130129213824/http:...ria-blame-Assad.html

See scan of complete deleted article below:

One day later, on January 30, a moderated news board thread was created, which is still online, at Mail Online about that article. “Thread: Syrian WMD False Flag – Are False Flags a way of life now?“

In their initial article Mail Online refers to an Infowars.com article (dated January 28, 2013), that’s where they probably found the information on the leaked e-mail and other documents.

CapitalBay (who published the wrong areal pictures of the school in Sandy Hook), Mail Online, Infowars, Yahoo News India, News Track India, Whale.to, Philippine Times, Uganda News, LiveLeak, Truth Media TV and others all claim in their mirrored articles that the alleged e-mail from Britam’s David Goulding to Philip Doughty was dated December 25, 2012.

However, at Neftegaz.ru (translated with Google) there also exists another version of the alleged e-mail. There the e-mail is dated December 24, 2012.

Whether the content of the alleged e-mail is correct, that’s open for debate. Fact is that PressTV has an article online which supports the claims in the alleged e-mail. And RT‘s article from last year (June 10, 2012) still claims that “Syrian rebels aim to use chemical weapons,” to then blame Assad for it. Those weapons came from Libya, according to RT. This begs the question: Did Christopher Stevens know about those weapons when he died in the CIA villa in Benghazi last year?

But why was the article pulled by Mail Online?

Why do there exist at least 2 versions of the same alleged e-mail?

And what about Britam admitting that they were hacked, according to Ruvr.co.uk (The Voice of Russia)?

But there’s also this, according to Mail Online it was a Malaysian hacker who got to the alleged e-mail(s), while Infowars claims that the e-mail was “obtained by a hacker in Germany.”

Either way, whoever initiated the Britam e-mail escapade did a good job at fooling both mainstream and alternative news outlets because it’s a real mess and few know what really happened and why.

Yet it’s ironic that Mail Online did not delete their other article where they wrote about the UN’s Carla Del Ponte who claims that Syrian rebels are responsible for “sarin gas attacks, which had been blamed on Assad’s troops.” The same rebels who now receive resources from the EU and the U.S., since the EU is buying oil from those “rebels” and the US is arming them for a proxy war as the Washington Post describes it.

Earlier it was reported that Israel had granted oil exploration rights inside Syria, in the occupied Golan Heights, to Genie Energy who’s shareholders include Rupert Murdoch and Lord Jacob Rothschild."
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2013/02/israel-grants-oil-rights-in-syria-to-murdoch-and-rothschild/

I'll merge this with the other thread

Thanks rep, interesting linkup and makes sense in a twisted way.

Actually, no I won't


Move along, nothing to see here

It is fucked up. We are racing into a 2003 in 2013

just like before and, it seems, for ever after

only difference is, then we had some minimal opposition to it

not looking good my friends

Invasion of Iran starting in 10..9...8...

BTW reptired, cheers for the smoking gun. came in useful elsewhere

All these soldiers need to ask themselves 2 questions.

1) Who are you fighting for

2) Who is the enemy

Everybody in life basically does everything out of belief, people don't buy iphones for example because of what they are or how they are made but WHY apple makes devices. Its the belief that people actually buy in to, especially the hardcore 'following' they have that stand outside stores hours and sometimes days before they open.

The same applies to religion, money etc, its all about belief in a particular mindset.
Many of us on this forum are of the opposite belief to all this for example. Key to belief is the dissemination of information via media.
The information does not have to be accurate, it only needs to be believed and if you repeat it often enough then it becomes believed.
Originally religion had a monopoly on this, now the media.

Of course its hard to judge what is true and what is not and in such situations most people will simply go with their own cultural mindset.

psketti wrote: I saw the other thread but thought this needed some space of it's own.
mikey mikey wrote:
andyh wrote:
Well, if they were capable of asking even one question perhaps they wouldn't have ended up as two legged attack dogs for the mentally ill.

I know I don't want to shoot or bomb some folks I never met

There's my truth right there

i remember this happening in january
sanctumzone.co.uk/forum/todays-news/9114....html?start=20#97257

www.cyberwarnews.info/reports/a-look-int...nce-data-leak-files/

mikey mikey wrote:
Ive never met you, but would surely like to bomb and shoot you

entrangermercenary1 wrote:

The fuck?

entrangermercenary1 wrote:
Well, before we bring up the issue of making threats on the internet generally and on this forum in particular, perhaps you would like to tell me why you wish to bomb and/or shoot me.

You posted that you have some military training, so perhaps you could also tell me which weapons you think you would prefer, if and when.

mikey mikey wrote:
Ah - having urged Ent to share his superior knowledge on the matter of weaponry previously, I'm quite confident he'd select one one that goes 'bang'.

Either that or one that goes, 'squirt'.

Read more at www.liveleak.com/view?i=806_1377376140#4ps3dt0t6LO7TJIK.99

Yep, this might have something to do with the shift in message with in the MSM

In the last few hours it has gone from "We can prove that Assad used CW" to "We have proof that CW have been used"

So basically, provided that CW traces can be found, whoever used them notwithstanding, the UN will green light another Libya/Iraq.

Love the way that coy boy Obama is playing the reluctant war-President. All this pretense that it is EU countries that wish to intervene while he urges caution.

tails do not wag dogs

Gilly wrote:
No, I think he can tell me the tech specs.

I really want to get the reason why he wants to shoot and bomb me and the possible weapons that he has in mind, before i take this any further.

psketti wrote:

Never been asked that before online

So Ent?

motive and method?

care to share?

mikey mikey wrote:
Again what a fucking letdown this forum is...all these great intellecutual minds , so serrrrrious

Is that a threat ive made mikey or a tounge in cheek comment.?
See all the smileys you daft cunt
Thought you had been "teaching the military" seems your clueless about banter, and obviously need to get out and integrate with mix with people.

Anyway back to the original question of what weapon !!

Well as you were instructing the Italian military, I would wait for you in REMF position as you would soon be retreating, then a double tap from my latest high tech ASIN B0013NTMI4 . Then saunter off into the sunset for a well earned